Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2898 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8664 of 2021
======================================================
M/s. Sri Gopikrishna Infrastructure Private Limited having its office at RT- 503, Fifth Floor, Royal Tara Apartment, Survey Mauza, Sheikpura, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Bihar, 800014 through its Authorized Representative, Gottumukkala. Krishna Raju (Male), Aged About 53 Years, S/o Suryanarayan Raju Residing at Flat No. 503, 5th Floor, Royal Tara Apartment, Brahamasthan Gali, Rajabazar, P.S. Shastri Nagar, P.O. Raja bazar, District Patna Bihar, 800014.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner cum Secretary, Commercial Tax Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Commercial Tax Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Patna West, Bihar.
4. Additional Commissioner State Tax (Appeals), Central, Patna.
5. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax Patna Central Circle, Patna, Bihar.
6. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, M/s Electrical Circle Saharsa, Aashta Bhawan, first Floor, Sant Nagar, Saharsa Bihar, 852201.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. S.C., CGST & CX Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)
Date : 01-07-2021
Our attention is invited to the Circular dated 11 th of Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
August, 2020, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of
Finance, Department of Revenue (State Taxes-I Section), and
Circular dated 27th of October, 2020, issued by the Government
of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central
Board of Indirect taxes & Customs) Legal Cell, copy whereof is
taken on record.
In view of the same, Union of India be impleaded
as Party Respondent No. 7.
Registry to make necessary correction, both on the
digital as also the hard file.
Dr. K.N. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General and Shri
Anshuman Singh, Sr. S.C., CGST & CX enter appearance on
behalf of the newly added respondents.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
" (i) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ quashing/ setting aside the order dated 05.03.2020 passed by Respondent No. 4 as well as the best-judgment assessment order dated 11.09.2019 passed under Section 62 of the CGST Act, 2017, for the month of July 2019;
(ii) For issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondents not take any coercive action including recovery from bank account and third parties until pendency of the present writ application.
iii) For issuing a writ of mandamus or any other Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
appropriate writ holding that inasmuch as the Petitioner has already filed the return for the month of July 2019 and paid the amounts of CGST and SGST along with interest, which is far in excess of the amounts demanded by the best-judgment assessment order dated 11.09.2019, thus, no further recovery can be made under the said order dated 11.09.2019;
(iv) For passing any such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
It is brought to our notice that vide impugned order
dated 05.03.2020 (Annexure-6) passed by Respondent No.
4, namely the Additional Commissioner State Tax
(Appeals), Patna in Appeal Case No. GST/PTC-49/19-20,
the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated
11.09.2019 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State
Tax, Patna Central, Patna West, Bihar in Reference
No.ZA100919006186N has been rejected merely on the
grounds of being barred by limitation. Both the orders
were ex parte in nature.
In our considered view, the delay stands
sufficiently explained on account of COVID restrictions.
Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has
no objection if the matter is remanded to the Appellate Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
Authority for deciding the appeal afresh. Also, while
considering and deciding the appeal, the ground of delay
shall not be taken into account and the appeal shall be
decided on merits. Also, during pendency of the appeal, no
coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
Statement accepted and taken on record.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties as
also perused the record made available, we dispose of the
present petition in the following mutually agreeable
terms:-
(a) We quash and set aside the impugned order
dated 05.03.2020 (Annexure-6) passed by Respondent No.
4, namely the Additional Commissioner State Tax
(Appeals), Patna in Appeal Case No. GST/PTC-49/19-20,
and order dated 11.09.2019 passed by the Joint
Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central, Patna West,
Bihar in Reference No.ZA100919006186N;
(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that
ten per cent of the total amount, being condition
prerequisite for hearing of the appeal, already stands
deposited. If that were so, the appeal shall be decided on Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
merits. However, if the amount is not deposited for
whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next
date;
(c) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the
respective rights and contention of the parties and
subject to the order passed by the Appellate Authority.
However, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner's
deposit is in excess, the same shall be refunded within
two months from the date of passing of the order;
(d) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of
the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in
reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present
petition. This shall be done immediately.
(e) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the
Appellate Authority i.e. Joint Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Magadh Division, Gaya on
1st of September, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible through
digital mode;
(f) The Appellate Authority shall condone the
delay in filing the appeal and decide the appeal on
merits after complying with the principles of natural Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
justice;
(g) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to
the parties to place on record all essential documents
and materials, if so required and desired;
(h) During pendency of the appeal, no coercive
steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
(i) The Appellate Authority shall pass a fresh
order only after affording adequate opportunity to all
concerned, including the writ petitioner;
(j) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to
fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take
unnecessary adjournment;
(k) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal
on merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two
months from the date of appearance of the petitioner;
(l) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the
order, if required and desired;
(m) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take
recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available
in accordance with law;
(n) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner
takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate Patna High Court CWJC No.8664 of 2021 dt.01-07-2021
forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with
law, with a reasonable dispatch;
(o) We have not expressed any opinion on merits
and all issues are left open;
(p) If possible, proceedings during the time of
current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through
digital mode;
The instant petition sands disposed of in the
aforesaid terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes
to communicate the order to the appropriate authority
through electronic mode.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
K.C.Jha/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.07.2021 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!