Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 21755 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A.No.1250 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
1.Alexander (minor)
Rep. by his Guardian Kaliamurthy
2.Kaliamurthy
... Appellants / Plaintiffs
Vs.
Dhandapani ... Respondent / 2nd defendant
Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree of the Lower Appellate
Court, the Principal Sub Judge, Viruthachalam in A.S.No.92 of 2005 on
06.02.2006 modifying the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, the 2nd
Additional District Munsif Court, Viruthachalam, dated 31.01.2005 passed
in O.S.No.229 of 1996.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : Mrs.Nilofar for
M/s.R.Meenal
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and
decree of the Lower Appellate Court, the Principal Sub Judge,
Viruthachalam in A.S.No.92 of 2005 on 06.02.2006 modifying the
judgment and decree of the Trial Court, the 2nd Additional District Munsif
Court, Viruthachalam, dated 31.01.2005 passed in O.S.No.229 of 1996.
2. Despite the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal"
on 13.11.2024, this Court has passed the following order:
"On 06.11.2024, when the matter was called, there
was no representation for the appellants and hence, the
matter was directed to be listed on 13.11.2024 (today)
under the caption, "For Dismissal".
2. Accordingly, today, the matter is listed under the
caption, “For Dismissal”. Today, when the matter was
taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appeared on
behalf of the appellants submitted that she has no
instructions from the appellants.
3. The records shows that on earlier occasions, there
is consecutively no representation on behalf of the
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
appellants. The present Second Appeal is of the year 2011
and the same is kept on the file of this Court, without any
progress. It appears that there is no possibility for arguing
this appeal since the appellant's counsel has no
instructions from the side of the appellants.
4. List the matter finally on 18.11.2024, under the
caption, "For Orders"."
3. Even today, when the matter is taken up, no representation for the
appellants. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Speaking order / Non-speaking order 18.11.2024
Index : Yes / No
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
gsk
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.N.MANJULA, J.
gsk To
1.The Principal Sub Judge, Viruthachalam.
2. 2nd Additional District Munsif Court, Viruthachalam.
S.A.No.1250 of 2011 and
18.11.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!