Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6163 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2023
C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
1.Subramani
2.Senbagavalli
3.Parameshwari
4.Parameshwaran .. Appellants
Versus
1.Govindasamy @ Chinnarasu
2.M.Velusamy
3.K.Chandiraraj
4.Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co.Ltd
2nd Floor, 60 A, Karuna Building
Mosuvanna Street, EVN Road
Erode .. Respondents
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree of the Motor Accidents
Claims Tribunal (Subordindate Court), Perundurai made in M.C.O.P.No.17 of
2014 dated 23.09.2016.
For Appellant : M/s.M.Sudha
For Respondents : E.Rajadurai for R4
for M/s.M.B.Gopalan Associates
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
JUDGMENT
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and
Decree of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Subordindate Court),
Perundurai made in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2014 dated 23.09.2016.
2.The manner of the accident, factum of the accident, rash and
negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle are not in dispute
3. On 19.07.2013, the deceased Saraswathi was hit by the driver of the
offending vehicle at Pungampadi to Mettukadai Road, Sanarpalayam and an
FIR came to be registered in Cr.No.136/2013 under Sections 279 & 337 of IPC.
4. The appellants are the claimants seeking to challenge the award passed
by the Tribunal on the ground of quantum. The first respondent is the driver of
the offending vehicle; the respondents 2 and 3 are the owner of the offending
vehicle and the fourth respondent is the Insurance Company. For the sake of
convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial
Court.
5. During the trial before the Tribunal, the fourth claim petitioner was
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
examined as PW1. Ex.P1 to P16 were marked. Ex.P1 is the FIR Copy, Ex.P8 is
the Death Certificate of the deceased, Ex.P9 is the Legal Heirship Certificate of
the deceased & Ex.P11 is the Discharge Summary. The Tribunal on
consideration of both oral and documentary evidences came to conclusion that
the accident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver
of the offending vehicle, accordingly, fixed the negligence liability both on the
owners of the offending vehicle and the Appellant Insurance Company.
Considering the age of the petitioner, i.e., 55 years, as per the Death Certificate,
the Trial Court fixed the notional income as Rs.5,000/- per month. As the
multiplier for 55 years of age is 11 as per Sarala Verma's case reported in 2009
2 TN MAC 1 (SC), it fixed the total loss of dependency to the claim petitioners
as Rs.4,95,000/- by deducting ¼ from the notional income (i.e., 5000 x 3/4 x 12
x 11). Furthermore, the Trial Court granted funeral expenses as Rs.25,000/-,
Bills at Rs.3,78,000/-, Rs.1,00,000 for love of affection to the claim petitioners
and Rs.50,000 as consortium to the first claim petitioner, totalling to the tune of
Rs.10,48,000/-.
6.The learned counsel for the claim petitioners submitted that the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
Tribunal did not considered in granting future prospects of the deceased as per
the case reported in 2013 (1) TN MAC Page No.641 and monthly income was
fixed to a meagre amount of Rs. 5000 which should be at least Rs.15,000/-.
Hence, seeks this Court to enhance the award amount awarded by the Tribunal.
7. Heard M/s.M.Sudha, learned counsel for the appellants and
Mr.E.Rajadurai, learned counsel for the fourth respondent Insurance Company
and perused the materials placed on record.
8. Considering the facts and also taking note of the plea raised by the
learned counsel for the appellants that the furture prospects was not considered
and also of the fact that at the time of accident, the deceased rode the two
wheeler carelessly and met with the accident. Therefore, the carelessness of the
deceased riding two wheeler on the date of accident, assumes significance.
9. In view of above, this Court is of the considered view that the income
of the deceased should be fixed at Rs.7000 along with future prospects of 10%
[(i.e., 7000+700=Rs.7,700/- (10%)] and the same is hereby enhanced; further,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
loss of love and affection to the claim petitioners are enhanced at Rs.1,20,000/-
and the loss of estate is hereby granted at Rs.15,000/-. However, the funeral
expenses is reduced at Rs.15,000 and similarly, consortium to the first claimant
is reduced at Rs.40,000/-. Accordingly, the award amount is modified as below:
Calculation Rs.
Loss of dependency to the claim petitioners Rs.7,62,300/-
(Rs.7700x12x11x3/4)
Funeral Expenses Rs.15,000/-
Consortium to the first claim petitioner Rs.40,000/-
Love and affection to the claim petitioners Rs.1,20,000/-
Medical Expenditure Rs.3,78,000/-
Loss of Estate Rs.15,000/-
Total compensation is hereby fixed at Rs.13,30,300/-
10. In fine,
(i) this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands partly allowed to the extent
indicated above. Accordingly, the compensation awarded is enhanced from
Rs.10,48,000/- to Rs.13,30,300/-. The rate of interest awarded by the Tribunal
remains in tact. No Costs.
(ii) the Fourth Respondent/ Insurance Company is directed to deposit the
enhanced award amount before the Tribunal, within a period of four weeks
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount, if any already
deposited and recover the same from the owner and the driver of the offending
vehicle/respondents 1 to 3.
(iii) On such deposit being made, the claimants are permitted to withdraw
their share in the award amount with proportionate accrued interest and costs,
as per the ratio of apportionment made by the Tribunal, less the award amount,
if any, already withdrawn, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal.
(iv) the Claim Petitioners are directed to pay the court fee, if any, for the
enhanced compensation amount and the Registry is directed to draft the decree
only after the receipt of Court fee.
06.06.2023 Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dhk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
To
The Presiding Officer, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Subordindate Court Perundurai
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
dhk
C.M.A.No.4365 of 2019
14.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!