Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17521 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2022
AS(MD)No.149/2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.11.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
AS (MD)No.149 of 2015
M.P.Nos.1 to 4 of 2015 and CMP No.8902/2022
1.Kumarasamy
2.Ramasamy @ Anantharaman .. Appellants/
Defendants
Vs.
1.Padmavathi
rep. by her power agent
Lenin
S/o.Ramasamy
Kulathur Post and Taluk
Pudukottai District.
2.Selvaram Gandhi
3.Ramasamy
4.Gowsalya
Ezhuvakkal (died)
5.Seetharaman @ Ravichandran
6.Annammal Madam
7.Azhagu
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
AS(MD)No.149/2015
8.Abdul Samadu : Respondents/
defendants
(2 to 4 and 6 to 8 respondents
remain exparte in lower court)
Prayer: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure
against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 made in O.S.No.48/2012
on the file of the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram.
For appellants : Mr.P.Balasubramanian
For respondents : No appearance for R1 to R4,
R8
Mr.P.Paranjothi for R5
Mr.A.John Vincent for R6
Mr.N.Balakrishnan for
proposed respondent
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.)
In spite of the earlier order passed on 27.10.2022, no steps have been
taken to implead the legal heirs of the first appellant. Once again the
learned counsel for the appellant seeks for time on the ground that he is yet
to receive instructions. In the meantime, the learned counsel, who was
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS(MD)No.149/2015
appearing for the fifth respondent, submitted that the 5th respondent also
died and the legal representatives of the 5th respondent must also be
impleaded. A petition has been filed by the counsel, who was appearing for
the first respondent, on the ground that the first respondent died and in his
place, the 9th respondent must be added in the appeal. We are not in a
position to implead any legal representatives of the deceased respondent/s,
since the appellants are not taking steps to implead the legal heirs of the first
appellant. The appellants due to their attitude have brought this appeal to a
complete stalemate.
2. In view of the above, this first appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution. No costs. consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are
closed.
(M.S.R.,J.) (N.A.V.,J.)
10.11.2022
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes
RR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS(MD)No.149/2015
To
1.The Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram.
2.The VR Section Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS(MD)No.149/2015
M.S.RAMESH,J.
and N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.
RR
AS (MD)No.149 /2015
10.11.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!