Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Divya Sri vs Mareeskannan
2022 Latest Caselaw 17307 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17307 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2022

Madras High Court
Divya Sri vs Mareeskannan on 4 November, 2022
                                                                          TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 04.11.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                              TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022
                                                         and
                                               C.M.P(MD).No.9044 of 2022

                     Divya Sri                                             ... Petitioner

                                                          versus

                     Mareeskannan                                           ... Respondent


                                  Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24
                     C.P.C. to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2022 on the file of
                     the Sub Court, Sattur, Virudhunagar District and transfer the same to
                     the Sub Court, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.


                                        For Petitioner       : Mr.S.Sathyachidambarm
                                        For Respondent       : Mr.M.Prabhu




                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking

transfer of H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2022 from the file of Sub Court, Sattur,

Virudhunagar, to the file of Sub Court, Devakottai, Sivagangai

2. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent herein is

the husband. The marriage between them was solemnized on

02.05.2016, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and out of the wedlock,

they are blessed with a female child. Due to some misunderstanding,

now, they are living separately. Thereafter, the respondent has filed

H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2022 before the Sub Court, Sattur, Virudhunagar

District, seeking divorce. Now, the petitioner and her child are living

along with her old-aged parents at Karaikudi. Since the petitioner

alone has to take care of her 4-year-old child and her aged parents, she

finds it difficult to travel from Karaikudi to Sattur. Hence, she filed the

present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022

H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2022 from the file of the Sub Court, Sattur,

Virudhunagar District, to the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai,

Sivagangai District.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the distance between Karaikudi and Sattur is around 165 kms. He

further submits that the petitioner is not having sufficient means to

travel and she depends upon her parents to meet out her day-to-day

expenses. Since she alone has to take care of her 4-year-old child, who

is studying at Karaikudi and her aged parents and there is no one to

accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel from Karaikudi to Sattur

for appearing before the Sub Court, Sattur, for each and every hearing.

The petitioner is also facing life threat at the hands of the respondent.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah vs-

Virendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the

convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into

account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of

Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in

(2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type

of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over

the convenience of the husband.

6. This Court, by taking into consideration that the convenience

of wife is to be taken into consideration at the time of considering

transfer petitions as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the

judgments cited supra, is inclined to allow the present petition.

7. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition stands

allowed. The proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2022 pending on the

file of the Sub Court, Sattur, Virudhunagar District, is withdrawn and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022

ordered to be transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai,

Sivagangai. The Sub Court, Sattur, Virudhunagar, is directed to

transmit the entire case records to the Sub Court, Devakottai,

Sivagangai District forthwith. The learned Sub Judge, Sub Court,

Devakottai, Sivagangai District, shall dispose of the case as

expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.11.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy

To

1. The Sub Court, Sattur, Virudhunagar.

2. The Sub Court, Devakottai, Sivagangai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

TR.C.M.P(MD).No.565 of 2022

04.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter