Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Chinnasamy vs C.Ezhilmani Mary Elizabeth @ ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 11986 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11986 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022

Madras High Court
G.Chinnasamy vs C.Ezhilmani Mary Elizabeth @ ... on 6 July, 2022
                                                                           C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 06.07.2022

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
                                                   and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

                                               C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018
                                             and C.M.P.No.8738 of 2018

                  G.Chinnasamy                                                     ... Appellant

                                                         Vs.

                  C.Ezhilmani Mary Elizabeth @ Induja                              ... Respondent

                  Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of the

                  Family Courts Act, 1984, against the order and decree dated 15.02.2018 made

                  in I.A.No.2660 of 2016 in F.C.O.P.No.4576 of 2011 on the file of the VII

                  Additional Family Court, Chennai.


                                        For Appellant     : Mr.T.P.Sekar

                                        For Respondent    : Ms.E.Swetha
                                                            for M/s.T.K.S.Gandhi


                                                  JUDGMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.]

The present appeal is filed challenging the order of the Family Court

dated 15.02.2018 made in I.A.No.2660 of 2016 in F.C.O.P.No.4576 of 2011.

The appellant filed O.P.No.4576 of 2011 under Section 27 (1)(d) of the

Special Marriages Act, for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty.

In the said O.P., the respondent filed counter statement in the month of June,

2013. The respondent filed I.A.No.2660 of 2016 under Section 24 of the

Hindu Marriages Act, claiming a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards interim

maintenance to the respondent and her daughter.

2.According to the respondent, the marriage between the appellant and

respondent was conducted on 07.05.2009 at Thiruverkadu Temple and

marriage was registered on 15.06.2009 under the Special Marriages Act,

1954. It is a love marriage. The appellant and respondent belong to different

religion and caste. The respondent further made various allegations against

the appellant. The appellant filed O.P.No.4576 of 2011 for divorce on the

ground of cruelty. The respondent, in the year 2016, filed I.A.No.2660 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

2016, claiming a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month towards interim maintenance

for herself and her daughter. According to the respondent, she is working as a

Lecturer in Annai Violet Arts and Science College, Ambattur, Chennai and

was earning a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month, which is not sufficient to

maintain herself and minor daughter who requires special treatment. The

School fee for the child is Rs.20,000/- per month. The child suffered with

cognitive disorder coupled with other ailments. The respondent is employed

in TASMAC as a Manager and is earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month and

also getting a sum of Rs.30,000/- as commission. With meagre income of the

respondent, she is not able to maintain herself and her daughter.

3.The appellant filed counter affidavit and denied all the allegations

made by the respondent. The appellant made allegations against the

respondent and submitted that the respondent is working as a Lecturer in

Annai Violet Arts and Science College and is getting Rs.30,000/- per month.

He filed O.P. in the year 2011 and the respondent is dragging on the

proceedings for more than 6 years. When the O.P. was posted for cross-

examination of appellant as P.W.1, she has filed the present petition for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

interim maintenance only to prolong the proceedings in the divorce petition.

According to the appellant, he is working as a Supervisor in TASMAC and

his monthly salary is Rs.7,500/- and take home salary is Rs.6,520/-, after

deduction of Rs.980/- towards EPF, FBF, HF and AIDR. The appellant is

residing in a rented house and he is spending Rs.3,000/- towards rent and has

to maintain aged mother and hence, prayed for dismissal of the petition.

4.The learned Judge, after considering the averments in the affidavit

and counter affidavit, directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.7,500/- per

month as interim maintenance to the respondent and her daughter from the

date of petition i.e., 15.11.2016.

5.Against the said order dated 15.02.2018 made in I.A.No.2660 of

2016 in O.P.No.4576 of 2011, the appellant has come out with the present

appeal.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reiterated the

averments made in the counter affidavit filed in I.A. and produced salary

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

certificate filed in the typed set of papers issued on 25.11.2016 to show that

he was getting Rs.7,500/- per month as gross salary and after deduction, his

take-home salary is Rs.6,520/-. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel

appearing for the appellant produced a salary certificate dated 26.06.2019,

stating that the gross salary of the appellant is Rs.10,250/- and take-home

salary after deduction is Rs.8,885/-. The learned counsel appearing for the

appellant submitted that the respondent is working in Annai Violet Arts and

Science College and is getting Rs.30,000/- per month and she is capable of

maintaining herself and child and prayed for setting aside the order of the

learned Judge and allowing the appeal.

7.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent

submitted that the respondent is not working in the said College. The

appellant is earning more than Rs.20,000/- per month. The daughter is

suffering from ailments and School fees of her daughter comes to Rs.20,000/-

per month. Apart from that, the respondent has to pay a sum of Rs.500/- per

month towards special tuition for mentally retarded child. The respondent is

unable to maintain herself and the minor child and hence, prayed for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

dismissal of the appeal.

8.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the

respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

9.It is an admitted fact that both the appellant and respondent are living

separately from 2011. It is also not disputed that daughter was born in the

wedlock and she has certain illness. According to the appellant, he is earning

a sum of Rs.7,500/- per month as gross salary and his take-home salary is

Rs.6,520/-. The appellant has filed salary certificate dated 25.11.2016 in the

typed set of papers. The appellant has not given any reason as to why he has

not produced that certificate before the Family Court. Today, he has produced

the salary certificate dated 26.06.2019 before this Court. The appellant is duty

bound to maintain his wife and daughter. Taking into consideration the fact

that the respondent has admitted in her affidavit that she is working as

Lecturer in Annai Violet Arts and Science College and getting Rs.10,000/- per

month and the gross salary of the appellant as on 2019 is Rs.10,250/- and

take-home salary is Rs.8,885/-, it will be in the interest of justice to modify

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

the order of the learned Judge and direct the appellant to pay a sum of

Rs.6,000/- per month towards interim maintenance, from the date of

application.

10.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that as

per the interim order of this Court dated 22.10.2019, the appellant is

continuing to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- per month to the respondent and

daughter towards interim maintenance. The learned counsel appearing for the

appellant submitted that there is no arrears. On instructions from the

respondent, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that

there is no arrears as on today. O.P. is of the year 2011. The learned counsel

appearing for the appellant submitted that O.P. is posted for evidence on

behalf of the respondent. The learned VII Principal Judge, VII Additional

Family Court, Chennai is directed to dispose of O.P.No.4576 of 2011 as

expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a period of 3 months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

With the above direction, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

(V.M.V., J) (S.S., J) 06.07.2022

Index : Yes / No gsa

To

1.The VII Principal Judge, VII Additional Family Court, Chennai

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

and S.SOUNTHAR,J.

(gsa)

C.M.A.No.1062 of 2018

06.07.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter