Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vipin Sen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1051 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1051 MP
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Vipin Sen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 February, 2026

          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:9479




                                                            1                           MCRC-2509-2026
                            IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                  AT JABALPUR
                                                      BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA
                                              ON THE 3 rd OF FEBRUARY, 2026
                                          MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2509 of 2026
                                                    VIPIN SEN
                                                      Versus
                                    THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                         Appearance:
                                 Shri Ashish Kumar Kurmi - Advocate for the applicant.
                                 Shri Nagendra Singh Solanki - Panel Lawyer for the State.

                                                                ORDER

This is the second application filed by the applicant under Section 483 o f Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for grant of regular bail relating to FIR/Crime No.425/2025 registered at Police Station-Gopalganj, District-Sagar (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 3(5), 49 of BNS and Sections 3/4, 5(l)/6, 16/17 of POCSO Act, 2012. The applicant is in custody since 20.09.2025. Earlier bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.12.2025 passed in M.Cr.C.

No.55540 of 2025.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that as per the DNA report received in respect of the fetus of the victim, the DNA matches with that of the co-accused namely Prashant Gautam who has already been enlarged on bail. The DNA of fetus does not match with that of the present applicant. On that basis, it is clear that the applicant had not sexually

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:9479

2 MCRC-2509-2026 assaulted the victim and the applicant has falsely been implicated in the case, hence, the applicant be released on bail.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application and submitted that although the DNA of the applicant does not match with the fetus of the victim but the DNA of co-accused matches with the fetus of victim. It is clear that the fetus was the result of sexual assault by the co- accused. It is further submitted that on the request and with the common intention of the present applicant, the victim carried from her home by the co-accused. It is also alleged that co-accused accompanied the victim to Bhopal and from Bhopal to Indore. Both the accused persons had sexually exploited the victim. Looking to the gravity of offence, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.

4. Heard the parties and perused the case diary.

5. On perusal of the record, it is clear that it is alleged by the prosecution that this applicant along with the co-accused had kidnapped the victim and on 16.09.2025, the co-accused took the victim from her home and carried her to Bhopal where both the accused persons met and thereafter the victim was carried to Indore where she was sexually exploited at Bhopal and Indore. However, from the prosecution case itself, it is clear that as per the DNA report submitted along with the case diary, on 01.11.2025, the fetus was of approximately nine weeks from which it is clear that the victim had conceived in August, 2025. This fact is further supported by the report of doctor who conducted the abortion and from the DNA report, the DNA of the co-accused matches with the fetus of the victim. Thus, it appears that the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:9479

3 MCRC-2509-2026 victim was in a relationship with the co-accused prior to leaving her house and the co-accused has already been granted bail.

6. Looking to the factual aspects of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the applicant on bail. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

7. It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance before the said Court on all such dates as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of trial.

8. It is further directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 480(3) of BNSS.

9. Accordingly, M.Cr.C. stands disposed of.

C.C. as per rules.

(DEVNARAYAN MISHRA) JUDGE

HK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter