Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hemant Bhoj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 5754 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5754 MP
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Hemant Bhoj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 March, 2025

Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Bench: G. S. Ahluwalia
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:6556




                                                              1                            MCRC-11743-2025
                              IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT GWALIOR
                                                          BEFORE
                                           HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA
                                                  ON THE 20th OF MARCH, 2025
                                            MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 11743 of 2025
                                                    HEMANT BHOJ
                                                       Versus
                                      THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                   Mr. Gaurav Mishra - Advocate for applicant.
                                   Dr. Anjali Gyanani - Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                                                  ORDER

This application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed against the order dated 27.02.2025 passed by Sessions Judge, Datia in Criminal Revision No.82/2024 as well as order dated 04.11.2024 passed by S.D.M., Sub-Division Datia, District Datia in Case No.07/145/CRPC/2021.

2. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that in the proceedings, which are pending under Section 145 of Cr.P.C., applicant filed an objection with regard to maintainability on the ground of pendency of civil suit

between the parties. On the first occasion, said application was rejected. However, matter was remanded back by the Sessions Judge for re- adjudication of the matter afresh. Even after remand, objection was dismissed by the S.D.M., Datia by order dated 04.11.2024. Being aggrieved by the said order, applicant preferred a revision which has beeen dismissed by Sessions Judge by order dated 27.02.2025.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:6556

2 MCRC-11743-2025

3. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that once the civil suit is pending, then in the light of judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ram Sumer Puri Mahant v. State of U. P. reported in AIR 1985 SC 472 as well as Amresh Tiwari vs Lalta Prasad Dubey reported in AIR 2000 SC 1504, the parties can approach the civil court for adjudication of their rights and the proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. are unwarranted.

4. Heard counsel for applicant.

5. The revisional court in paragraph 12 of the impugned order has mentioned that the application filed by applicant under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. has been dismissed by the trial court by order dated 31.10.2023. However, counsel for applicant is not in a position to make a statement as to

whether aforesaid order passed by the trial court was ever challenged by the applicant under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of C.P.C. or not.

6. Since applicant has already approached civil court but has failed to obtain order of temporary injunction, then this Court is of the considered opinion that proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. cannot be said to be not maintainable because under these proceedings, Magistrate is only required to verify as to who was in possession of the property in dispute two months prior to the institution of the proceedings. Magistrate is not required to decide the title.

7. Where possession of the applicant has not been protected by the trial Court, then the Magistrate can proceed further with proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. However, since counsel for applicant is not in a position to make a statement as to whether any miscellaneous appeal was

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-GWL:6556

3 MCRC-11743-2025 ever filed against order dated 31.10.2023, therefore, this petition is disposed of with following observations :-

(i) If order dated 31.10.2023 was not challenged and it has attained finality, then S.D.M. can proceed further in the proceedings registered under Section 145 of Cr.P.C.

(ii) If any miscellaneous appeal was filed and it has been dismissed, still the Magistrate can proceed further in the proceedings initiated under Section 145 of Cr.P.C.

(iii) If a miscellaneous appeal has been filed and it is pending, then the applicant is granted liberty to file a fresh objection with regard to maintainability in case if he succeeds in the miscellaneous appeal filed by him.

8. If the appeal is dismissed, then the liberty granted by this Court in Clause (iii) shall not be available to applicant.

9. With aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of.

(G. S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE

AKS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter