Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anurag Prasad Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 6736 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6736 MP
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Anurag Prasad Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 June, 2025

          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:25780




                                                              1                               WP-7957-2025
                              IN     THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                     AT JABALPUR
                                                          BEFORE
                                               HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN
                                                    ON THE 17th OF JUNE, 2025
                                                 WRIT PETITION No. 7957 of 2025
                                               ANURAG PRASAD MISHRA
                                                       Versus
                                      THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                   Ms. Taneyaa Manucha, learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                   Shri Ved Prakash Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for
                           respondent/State.

                                                                  ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the representations dated 04.12.2024, 09.12.2024, 17.12.2024 and 01.01.2025 and provide the benefit of salary to the petitioner from the due date.

(ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to comply with the order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court on 23.02.2024.

(iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deems fit and proper in favour of petitioner may also be given and cost of petition, in the interest of justice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner during course of the arguments submits that there is an award of reinstatement of Labour Court dated 23/02/2024 placed on record as Annex.P/2, wherein the Labour Court directed the reinstatement of petitioner in service without backwages. The petitioner has been reinstated in service as Labourer but neither the benefit of classification has been given to the petitioner nor he has been given the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:25780

2 WP-7957-2025

status of classified employee and also that since 15/09/2024 his salary has been stopped by the Department and his attendance has not been taken. Therefore, in the said manner he has been again illegally retrenched from service by not marking his attendance and by not paying him salary despite having an award of reinstatement of labour Court in his favour.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in light of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others reported in (2002) 9 SCC 492, in case of reinstatement upon setting aside the order of termination, the continuity of services has to be reckoned and therefore, the petitioner has to be considered for conferring the benefits of sthaikarmi and other benefits as at par with his counter parts

who were engaged in the year 2014.

4. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, it is seen that the petitioner has been representing that his salary has been stopped from 15/09/2024. Some enquiry into the complaints was made by the Deputy DFO, Rewa, whereby it was found either the petitioner has remained absent or he was engaged for less number of days, hence, the salary has been paid to him for the period he has worked. The said report has been submitted to the DFO, Rewa. From a perusal of the documents placed on record, it appears that the DFO, Rewa is yet to take any decision in the matter.

5. Accordingly, this Court deems it fit to direct the respondents No.3 & 4 to take note of grievances of the petitioner and verify whether the petitioner is not being engaged for the entire month or his attendance has not been

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:25780

3 WP-7957-2025 taken for entire month despite he being present on duty. If that is the situation, let corrective measures be taken by the respondents No.3 & 4.

6. The respondents No.3 & 4 shall also examine whether the petitioner is entitled for conferment of benefit of sthaikarmi as per policy dated 07/10/2016 as more than 10 years have passed since initial engagement of the petitioner.

7. Upon examining the entitlement of the petitioner under the said policy, necessary order be passed by the respondents No.3 & 4 strictly as per law and without being influenced by any observations of this Court.

8. Let the aforesaid action be completed within a period of two months from the date of production of this order.

9. This petition is disposed of.

(VIVEK JAIN) JUDGE

RS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter