Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3184 MP
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025
1 MP-3049-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2025
MISC. PETITION No. 3046 of 2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SHRI RAJESH
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
WITH
MISC. PETITION No. 3047 of 2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SHRI TEJKARAN
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
MISC. PETITION No. 3048 of 2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SMT. JYOTI SIHORE
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
MISC. PETITION No. 3049 of 2021
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PRAMOD
KUSHWAHA
Signing time: 22-01-2025
18:16:06
2 MP-3049-2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SHRI MANOHAR SIHOTE
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
MISC. PETITION No. 3050 of 2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SHRI SMT. PAVITRA SIHOTE
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
MISC. PETITION No. 3053 of 2021
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Versus
SHRI DEEPAK SIHOTE
Appearance:
Shri Kushal Goyal - Dy.A.G for the petitioner/State.
Ms.Archana Upadhayay - Advocate for the respondent.
ORDER
Counsel for the respondents prays for disposal of petitions in the light of the judgment passed in M.P No.3052/2021 (Government Engineering College vs. Shri Balram) by co-ordinate Bench in the case of similarly situated employee Shri Balram whereby the similar award as passed by the labour Court in the present case was challenged by the same petitioner but
3 MP-3049-2021 the award was upheld and the Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed.
The petitioner filed SLP (civil) Diary No.32375/2024. The said SLP has been dismissed on 13/12/2024. The Apex Court held that they are not inclined to interfere in the order passed by the High Court. Thus, the order passed by this Court has been affirmed by the Supreme Court.
Counsel for the petitioner also could not distinguish the case of the respondents with the case of the similarly situated employee Shri Balram.
In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that the judgment of the similarly situated employee Shri Balram shall apply mutatis mutandis in the present petitions.
With the aforesaid, present petitions are disposed off. All pending I.As shall also stand disposed off.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE
PK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!