Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Agam Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 1612 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1612 MP
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Agam Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 January, 2023
Author: Anand Pathak
                                 1

      IN THE        HIGH COURT            OF MADHYA
                            PRADESH

                        AT J A B A L P U R
                             BEFORE
         HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK

               ON THE 30th OF JANUARY, 2023

           MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 57784 of 2022

BETWEEN:-
AGAM SINGH S/O MUNNA SINGH @
PRITHVIRAJ SINGH, AGED ABOUT 27
YEARS,   OCCUPATION:       FARMER   R/O
VILLLAGE    CHURHAT       P.S. CHURHAT
DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
                                                  .....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI SANKALP KOCHAR- ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH POLICE STATION CHURHAT
DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
                                               .....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI NARENDRA CHOURASIYA- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
      This application coming on for admission this day, the court

passed the following:

                              ORDER

The applicant has filed this SECOND bail application u/S 439

Cr.P.C. for grant of bail, who has been in judicial custody since

19.02.2022 in connection with Crime No.503/2017 registered at

Police Station-Churhat, District-Rewa for the offence punishable under

Section 20(b)(ii) of NDPS Act, after having been dismissed the first

application being M.Cr.C.No.11101/2022 with the liberty to approach this

Court afresh if the trial is not concluded by the 1st December, 2022.

It is the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that he

is suffering confinement since 19.02.2022 and all material prosecution

witnesses have been examined, therefore, chance of tampering with the

evidence/witness is remote. He referred the earlier order dated 12.04.2022

passed in M.Cr.C.No.11101/2022, whereby Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court while dismissing the application filed by the applicant giving the

liberty to renew the prayer in the 1 st week of December, 2022, if the trial

is not concluded.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that trial is still

going on. He referred the fact that trial of co-accused resulted in acquittal

vide order dated 13.03.2020 passed by the Special Judge (NDPS Act)

Sidhi from the same charge. Since applicant was absconding, therefore,

he had to suffer the incarceration. Even otherwise, source of implication

is memo under section 27 of the Evidence Act. Nothing less nothing

more. He referred the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Tufan

Singh Vs. State of Tamilnadu (2021) 14 SCC 1, and also the judgment of

this Court in the case of Gopal Krishan Gautam @ Pandit Vs. State of

M.P. and Another passed in M.Cr.C.No.31747/2021 dated 28.07.2021.

The applicant does not bear any criminal record. Therefore chance be

given for course correction. Confinement amounts to pre-trial detention.

He undertakes to cooperate in trial and will abide by all the terms and

conditions as imposed by this court. He further undertakes to perform

community service to purge his misdeeds if any and to save

National/Environmental/ Social Cause. Under these grounds, counsel

prayed for bail.

Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the prayer and

submitted that he bears criminal record of nine cases of Excise Act.

However, he fairly submits that no case of NDPS Act found against the

applicant except this case.

Considering the period of custody and the fact that co-accused has

already been acquitted by the trial Court as well as the fact that source of

implication is based upon the memo under section 27 of the Evidence Act

and 67 of the NDPS Act, this Court intends to allow the application but

with certain stringent conditions and a chance be given to him for course

correction, without commenting on the merits of the case, and as per the

spirit of community service echoed in the order of Sunita Gandharva

Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2020(3) MPLJ (Cri.) 247, the application

is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail

on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh

Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of

trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the

following conditions by the applicant:-

1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond

executed by him;

2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may

be;

3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat

or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police

Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of

which he is accused;

5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the

trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

7. The applicant shall not involve in any criminal activity in future

and would participate in creative pursuits.

8. Th applicant shall mark his presence in the first week of every

month before the Police Station concerned till the conclusion of the

trial between 10:30 am to 2:30 pm.

9. It is made clear that this bail is granted once the case is made out

for bail and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given

and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can

be given bail without considering the merits.

,rn~ }kjk ;g Hkh funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 10 ikS/kksa dk Qy nsus

okys isM+ vFkok [email protected] jksi.k djsxk rFkk mUgs vius vkl iMksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk

ds fy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g

drZO; gS fd u dosy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k

ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV Åwaps ikS/[email protected]+ksa

dks yxk;sxs rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds

fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds

le{k o`{[email protected]/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djus gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] vxys rhu o"kZ rd

gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh

tk,xhA

o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk vkosnd dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds

dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ

fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr

vkSj vkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk

gS ,oa vkosnd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k

izR;sd rhu ekg esa izLrqr dh tk;sxhA

o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd

vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA

vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/[email protected] dks jksius dh Lor=ark

gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] vU;Fkk

vkosnd dks o`{kksa ds jksi.k ds fy, rFkk muds lqj{kk mik;ksa ds fy, vko';d [kpsZ ogu

djuk gksxsaA

bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa

rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk ,dkdkj

gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; Lfkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo vfLrRo ds

vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus

dh vko';drk gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo

vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA

;g funsZ'k vkosnd ds }kjk Lor% O;Dr dh xbZ lkeqnkf;d lsok dh bPNk

ds dkj.k fn;k x;k gS tks LoSfPNd gSA

^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d fopkj ds vadqj.k

dk gSA^^

It is expected from the applicant that he shall submit

photographs by downloading the mobile application (NISARG App)

prepared at the instance of High Court for monitoring the plantation

through satellite/ Geo-tagging/Geo-fencing.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for

compliance and information.

Certified copy as per rules.

(ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE rk RAVIKAN Digitally signed by RAVIKANT KEWAT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, postalCode=482001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=a8d9b14ac58cf947b7ed23741112684b5277de5c82 8d98b25803bbc1b20fce6e,

T KEWAT pseudonym=4765BE6D8978BB39BCB2A90E8E9544E8752FB D38, serialNumber=B4ADF2781367121A8C6194CA0D70E6499C42 4F691EB777334632E1B1713FB624, cn=RAVIKANT KEWAT Date: 2023.01.31 10:35:18 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter