Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6973 MP
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMA
ON THE 28th OF APRIL, 2023
WRIT APPEAL No. 1139 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
1. AVTEC & HINDUSTAN MOTORS SHRAMIK
SANGH, PITHAMPUR, DISTRICT DHAR
THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY MR.
VIJAY PATIL, B/M150, HOUSING BOARD
COLONY, PITHAMPUR, DISTT.-DHAR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. MR. VISHAL VAIRAGHAR S/O. LATE SHRI
VISHNUPANT, 181, SAHAKAR NAGAR, CAT
SQUARE, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI BRIAN D'SILVA - SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH
SHRI SHASHANK SHARMA - ADVOCATE )
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
LABOUR DEPARTMENT,VALLABH
BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND SPECIFIED
AUTHORITY FOR RETRENCHMENT UNDER
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT 1947,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, MOTI
BUNGLOW, M.G. ROAD, INDORE (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. AVTEC LIMITED THROUGH ITS FACTORY
MANAGER AND VICE PRESIDENT, AVTEC
LIMITED, PITHAMPUR, DHAR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI UMESH GAJANKUSH - ADDL. ADVOCATE
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VARGHESE
MATHEW
Signing time: 28-04-2023
17:31:55
2
GENERAL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 & 2 AND SHRI
J.P.CAMA - SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MS. KIRTI
PATWARDHAN - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT
NO.3 )
Reserved on : 25.04.2023
Pronounced on : 28.04.2023
This appeal having been heard and reserved for orders, coming for
pronouncement this day, JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA passed the
following:
ORDER
The present intra court appeal under Section 2(1) of Madhya Pradesh
Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 was
filed against the order dated 21.10.2021 passed by learned Single Judge in
WP No.5344/2020 whereby the petition filed by the appellant was allowed
and an order was passed to make a reference to the Tribunal u/S.25-N(6) of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
2. Against the same order WA No.1102/2021 filed by the respondent
No.3 has been dismissed today by separate order. The appellant is aggrieved
by only one part of the order whereby challenge to the order dated 3.2.2020
(Annexure P/5) has been declined mainly on the ground that challenging the
same order, a Writ Petition WP No.247/2020 was filed and the said writ
petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous in view of the
subsequent events. No liberty was sought in the said petition, and, therefore,
in para 8 of the impugned judgment the Court refused to entertain the present
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARGHESE MATHEW Signing time: 28-04-2023 17:31:55
petition so far challenge to the said order was concerned. We do not find
any illegality in the order impugned.
3. Even otherwise in view of the order passed by us today in WA
No.1102/2021 filed by respondent No.3, nothing survives for adjudication
on merit as we have upheld the order of direction for reference to the
Tribunal for adjudication of the application filed by the appellant.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) (ANIL VERMA)
JUDGE JUDGE
VM
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VARGHESE
MATHEW
Signing time: 28-04-2023
17:31:55
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!