Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4312 MP
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.9565/2022
Ghanshyam Baghel vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 28/03/2022
Shri Prasun Maheshwari, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri PPS Vajeeta, Counsel for the respondent/State.
Case diary is available.
This second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail. The first application was dismissed by order
dated 22.2.2021 passed in M.Cr.C.No.8440/2021.
The applicant has been arrested on 8.1.2021 in connection with
Crime No.09/2021 registered at Police Station Girwai, District
Gwalior for offence under Section 376 of IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the
prosecutrix has turned hostile. There is no substantial evidence against
the applicant. The trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there
is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution
case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. However, in view of DNA test report, it is
submitted that DNA profile found on the incriminating articles of the
prosecutrix were different from the DNA profile of the applicant, but it
is submitted that it appears that either the witnesses had made a false
report or they have not narrated the true facts before the Court,
therefore, they are liable to be prosecuted.
Whether the prosecution of witnesses is desirable or not is left
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.9565/2022 Ghanshyam Baghel vs. State of M.P.
to the discretion of the Trial Court. Therefore, it is directed that the
Trial Court while deciding the trial shall address on this issue also and
shall pass a specific order as to whether the prosecution of the
witnesses is warranted or not.
In view of DNA test report, and without commenting on the
merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the
applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum
of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge (alok)
ALOK KUMAR 2022.03.28 18:31:52 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!