Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Lodhi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 3504 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3504 MP
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mukesh Lodhi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 March, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                              1
           THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                    MCRC No.11065/2022
                 Mukesh Lodhi vs. State of M.P.

Gwalior, Dated : 11/03/2022

      Shri Mukesh Kumar Bhatele, Counsel for the applicant.

      Shri N.K. Gupta, Counsel for the respondent/State.

Case diary is available.

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for

grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on18.2.2022 in connection with

Crime No.15/2022 registered by Police Station - Morar, District -

Gwalior for offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 511, 393 of

IPC and Section 11, 13 of MPDVPK Act.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to

the prosecution case, the applicant along-with other co-accused

persons clandestinely entered inside the Gaushala in order to commit

theft. Although one co-accused Rahul Lodhi was apprehended on the

spot but other three persons succeeded in running away and it is also

alleged that one gunshot was also fired in air. The applicant is in jail

from 18.2.2022. The applicant may also be extended the same benefit

of bail which has been given to co-accused Rahul Lodhi. The

applicant is ready and willing to abide by any condition which may be

imposed by the Court including the condition on which the co-accused

Rahul Lodhi was released on bail. It is further submitted that the

applicant is ashamed of his misdeeds and in order to show his

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.11065/2022 Mukesh Lodhi vs. State of M.P.

bonafides, he is also ready and willing to donate Rs.50,000/- to

Laltipara Gaushala for care and treatment of cows. The trial is likely

to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his

absconding or tampering with prosecution case.

Per contra, the application is opposed by the counsel for the

respondent/State.

The co-accused Rahul Lodhi has been granted bail by order

dated 20.1.2022 passed in M.Cr.C.No.1973/2022 with the following

observations:

"In reply, it is submitted by Counsel for applicant that it is true that applicant was apprehended on the spot, however, he is ashamed of his misdeeds and in order to show his bonafide, he is ready to donate Rs. 50,000/- to Laltipara Gaushala for the care and treatment of the cows.

In view of the submission made by Counsel for the applicant, this Court is of the considered opinion that as the applicant has no criminal history, one more opportunity should be granted to the applicant to improve himself.

Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that subject to donating an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) to Laltipara Gaushala and on producing the receipt thereof as well as on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court, the applicant be released on bail to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court."

Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, this

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.11065/2022 Mukesh Lodhi vs. State of M.P.

application is also allowed. It is directed that subject to donating an

amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) to Laltipara

Gaushala and on producing the receipt thereof as well as on

furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One

Lac Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the

Trial Court/Committal Court, the applicant be released on bail to

appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in

case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the

case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021

in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of

bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rule.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge (alok)

ALOK KUMAR 2022.03.11 15:46:47 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter