Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2364 j&K
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2023
Sr. No. 4
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 264/2023
Geeta Raina .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. RDS Bandral, Advocate
Vs
..... Respondent(s)
Bhupinder Kumar Administrative Secretary
Health and Medical Education Department
and ors.
Through:
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
20.10.2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner while addressing his arguments with
regard to maintainability of the petition in view of Section 20 of the
Contempt of the Courts Act, has submitted that non-implementation of the
order passed by the Writ Court gives recurring cause of action to the
petitioner as the monetary benefits on account of scale of pay admissible
under the order of the Writ Court, have not been granted to him. Besides
this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that power of the
High Court under Article 215 of the Constitution of India cannot be
curtailed by the provisions contained under Section 20 of Contempt of
Courts Act. On this ground, learned counsel for the petitioner has
submitted that the instant contempt petition cannot be thrown out on the
ground of limitation. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has
relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in case titled, 'Pallav
Sheth Seth vs. Custodian and ors.' reported in (2001) 7 SCC 549.
2. There appears to be merit in the submission made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner. Accordingly, the contempt petition is entertained and it
is directed that notice be issued to the respondents for filing statement of
facts/compliance report by the next date of hearing, subject to petitioner's
taking necessary steps within a week's time.
3. List on 08.12.2023.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE
Jammu 20.10.2023 Neha-II
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!