Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Faizan Ahmad Zargar And Anr vs Ut Of Jk And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1597 j&K/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1597 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2021

Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench
Faizan Ahmad Zargar And Anr vs Ut Of Jk And Ors on 10 December, 2021
                                                                Serial No. 23
                                                           Supplementary cause list



      HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                  AT SRINAGAR

                                                    CM No. 8096/2021 in
                                                    WP(C) No. 2568/2021
                                                     CM No. 8097/2021

Faizan Ahmad Zargar and Anr.
                                                               ..... Petitioner(s)
                                 Through: -
                         Mr. Syed Musaib, Advocate

                                      V/s
UT of JK and Ors.
                                                             ..... Respondent(s)

Through: -

Ms. Asifa Padroo, AAG CORAM:

Hon'ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge Hon'ble Mr Justice Mohd Akram Chowdhary, Judge Order 10.12.2021 (Oral)

CM No. 8096/2021

On the set of facts and grounds urged, coupled with the submissions

made at Bar, the instant application is allowed and applicants are permitted to

file the instant petition without attaching the certified copy of the order dated

06.12.2021.

CM disposed of.

WP(C) No. 2568/2021

The petitioners in the instant petition, have challenged the order dated

06.12.2021, passed by the CAT Bench, Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as

CAT Bench, Srinagar) in OA No. 1758/2021 with consequent challenge of

the impugned order bearing No. PSC /Lit/J-1/2021 dated 25.11.2021, issued by respondent Public Service Commission (for short the Commission) with

further direction to entertain the candidature of the petitioners for the post of

Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, advertised in terms of

advertisement Notice No. 05-PSC(DR-P) of 2021 dated 11.05.2021, by the

Commission on the grounds detailed out in the petition.

Brief facts:-

The respondent Public Service Commission vide Notification No. 05-

PSC (DR-P) of 2021 dated 11.05.2021, invited the applications through online

mode from the eligible candidates who are domiciled in the UT of J&K,

possessing the prescribed/Academic professional qualification and age for the

post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies, in terms of the J&K

Cooperative (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1976, issued vide SRO

591 dated 07.10.1977 as amended from time to time and J&K Probationer

(Conduct of Service, Pay & Allowance) and Fixation of Tenure Rules, 2020,

notified vide S.O. 192 of 2020 dated 17.06.2020 and J&K Public Service

Commission (Business and Procedure) Rules, 2021.

The petitioners (already registered with JKPSC) being fully eligible

(petitioner No. 1, a Ph.D scholar and petitioner No. 2, Post Graduate student

and desirous of applying to the post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative

Societies bonafidely attempted to access the official website of the respondent

Commission on 14.06.2021, before the cutoff date but due to the technical

snag in the system. On 15.06.2021, they attempted again to fill the application

form and submit the same but due the same technical issue the petitioners

could not access the official website of the respondent No. 2.

The petitioners on 16.06.2021, (last date) made another attempt to fill

up the application form in the prescribed format and on the last date

fortunately they could access the official website of the respondent

Commission and accordingly competed the application form (personal

information) and selection of the exam (i.e. Assistant Registrar Cooperative

Societies) through on-line mode before the cutoff date, but the payments

towards the applications were not completed due to technical issues faced by

the petitioners.

It is submitted that it was only the petitioners herein who suffered the

technical issue while submitting the application form, but some other eligible

candidates also faced the similar issue, which facts can be ascertained from

the screenshots of social media handles retrieved from the internet

The petitioners time and again approached the respondents with the

request to allow the petitioners to deposit the application fee and for

acceptance of their candidature for the post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative

Societies, Recruitment Exam through offline mode as the online transactions

failed due to a server error. It is submitted that the entreaties made by the

petitioners to the respondents, no heed was paid to the said requests of the

petitioners by the respondents. It is submitted that the petitioners were left

with no option but to approach the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal,

Jammu Bench, by way of an original application which came to be registered

as OA No. 1700 of 2021. Upon motion hearing the Hon'ble Tribunal after

hearing the matter and perusing the record was pleased to dispose of the OA

with a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the applicants, if any, pending with PSC and take a decision on the same in accordance with

law by passing a reasoned and speaking order with a period of 10 days from

today under intimation to the applicants.

It is submitted that the respondent No. 3, in purported compliance of

the order dated 12.11.2021, passed the impugned order dated 25.11.2021. The

written test for the post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative societies in

Cooperative Department is scheduled to be conducted on 12.12.2021 and the

admit cards for the same shall be available w.e.f. 02.12.2021.

The petitioners approached the Hon'ble CAT Bench, Srinagar,

challenging the order passed by the respondent Commission, on the statement

made by the counsel appearing for respondent Co-operative Department,

wherein it was stated that Co-operative department is a society and an

autonomous authority, therefore, the CAT has no authority to deal with the

matter and only the Hon'ble High Court has the jurisdiction to entertain the

petition and accordingly, the CAT erred in disposing the petition and asking

the petitioners to approach the Hon'ble High Court. The petitioners are

challenged the order of the CAT Bench, Srinagar, on the grounds detailed out

in the petition.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the CAT

Bench, Srinagar, has merely on the statement of counsel appearing for the

respondents that the subject matter pertains to Co-operative Societies,

declined to entertain the OA with reference to no jurisdiction to deal with the

matters pertaining to the Societies. Learned counsel further submits that the

subject matter of the OA has reference to filling up the post of Assistant Registrar Co-operative Societies borne on the Service of the J&K Co-

operative (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1977. Learned counsel further

submits that the post is to be filled up by open competition having reference

to method of recruitment, provided by recruitment rules, as mentioned above

and is a civil post for all intends and purposes. Learned counsel appearing for

the petitioners submits that the pleadings made and the contentions raised in

the OA were not considered by the CAT Bench, Srinagar, while returning the

OA on the ground of having no jurisdiction.

Ms. Asifa Padroo, learned AAG, was pointedly asked as to how the

post of Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies under reference of Public

Service Commission for filling up in terms of recruitment rules above is not

covered for the jurisdiction of the CAT Bench, had no reply. The scheme of

law and the jurisdiction of the CAT, Bench Srinagar, in service matters stands

discussed by this Court and findings recorded while dismissing the writ

petition, directly filed before this Court.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the matter on the

above preliminary question.

Admittedly, the petition relates to claim of the petitioners for

recruitment on the posts of Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies. Chapter

III of the Central Administrative Act, 1985 (CAT Act), provides for

jurisdiction, powers and authority of the Central Administrative Tribunals.

Section 14 thereunder reads as under:

"14. Jurisdiction, powers and authority of the Central Administrative Tribunal. -

(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the Central Administrative Tribunal shall exercise, on and from the appointed day, all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable immediately before that day by all courts, except the Supreme Court, in relation to--

(a) recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, to any All-India Service or to any civil service of the Union or a civil post under the Union or to a post connected with defence or in the defence services, being, in either case, a post filled by a civilian;

(b) all service matters concerning--

(i) a member of any All-India Service; or

(ii) a person, not being a member of an All-India Service or a person referred to in clause (c), appointed to any civil service of the Union or any civil post under the Union; or

(iii) a civilian, not being a member of an All-India Service or a person referred to in clause (c), appointed to any defence services or a post connected with defence;

and pertaining to the service of such member, person or civilian, in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or of any local or other authority within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India or of any corporation or society owned or controlled by the Government;

(c) all service matters pertaining to service in connection with the affairs of the Union concerning a person appointed to any service or post referred to in sub- clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) of clause (b), being a person whose services have been placed by a State Government or any local or other authority or any corporation 4 [or society] or other body, at the disposal of the Central Government for such appointment.

Explanation.-- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that references to 'Union' in this sub-section shall be construed as including references also to a Union territory.

(2) The Central Government may, by notification, apply with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification the provisions of sub-section (3) to local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India and to corporations or societies owned or controlled by Government, not being a local or other authority or corporation or society controlled or owned by a State Government:

Provided that if the Central Government considers it expedient so to do for the purpose of facilitating transition to the scheme as envisaged by this Act, different dates may be so specified under this sub-section in respect of different classes of, or different categories under any class of, local or other authorities or corporations or societies.

(3) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the Central Administrative Tribunal shall also exercise, on and from the date with effect from which the provisions of this sub-section apply to any local or other authority or corporation or society, all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable immediately before that date by all courts, except the Supreme Court, in relation to--

(a) recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, to any service or post in connection with the affairs of such local or other authority or corporation or society; and

(b) all service matters concerning a person, other than a person referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1), appointed to any service or post in connection with the affairs of such local or other authority or corporation or society and pertaining to the service of such person in connection with such affairs."

It is thus seen that Section 14, delineating the matters in relation with

which the Tribunals have been prescribed to have the jurisdiction, speaks of

recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, inter alia, to any civil

service of the Union or a civil post under the Union. The word 'Union' in

terms of Explanation appended under Section 14(1)(c) has reference also to a

Union Territory. The words used are 'civil service' or 'civil post'. The

question is whether the post of Supervisor is a civil post.

It is seen that the post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies is

borne on the Service of the Jammu and Kashmir Co-operative (Gazetted)

Service Recruitment Rules, 1976 issued vide SRO 591 dated 07.10.1977. In

terms of Rule 5 of the Recruitment Rules, recruitment to the posts borne on

the Service are prescribed to be made by direct recruitment, or by promotion,

or partly by direct recruitment and partly by promotion in the ration and in the manner provided in Schedule-II appended to the Rules. Schedule-II prescribes

the post of Supervisor to be a Class II post under Section-C of the Schedule,

carrying a regular scale of pay. The method of recruitment is prescribed to be

(i) 50% by direct recruitment; (ii) 25% by selection through Departmental

Selection Committee.

It thus transpires from a bare perusal of the Recruitment Rules, that the

post of Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies, to which the petitioners

herein claim their right to promotion, is a duly sanctioned post borne on a

Civil Service of the Union Territory of the Jammu and Kashmir and meets all

the requirements of being a civil post. That being the position, the claim of the

petitioners, admittedly, relates to the recruitment and/or matters concerning

recruitment to a civil service and/order a civil post under the Union.

Consequently, in terms of the mandate of Section 14 of the CAT Act, it is the

Tribunal which has the jurisdiction as a Court of first instance to exercise all

the jurisdiction, powers and authority vis-à-vis this petition, which were

exercisable by this Court prior to the appointed day.

The view taken hereinabove is supported by the Judgment of the

Coordinate Bench of this Court, rendered in LPA No. 123/2020 titled Abdul

Qayoom Chalkoo Vs. UT of JK and Ors. Paragraphs 9 to 11 being relevant

are extracted as under:-

"09. At the first blush, what requires to be stated is that after His Excellency the President made the Constitutional (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019 (C.O. 272) dated 5th of August, 2019 read with the Declaration made under Article 370(3) of the Constitution in terms of Notification G.S.R. 562(E) (C.O. 273) dated 6th of August, 2019; and after the Parliament enacted the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019 (No.34 of 2019), the Government of India in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training), New Delhi, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act of 1985, issued Notification G. S. R. 267(E) dated 29th of April, 2020 extending the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, inter alia, to the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Subsequently, by another notification, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the Act of 1985, the said Department issued Notification No. G.S.R. 317(E) dated 28th of May, 2020, specifying Jammu and Srinagar as the places at which the Benches of the Central Administrative Tribunal shall ordinarily sit for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh. Further, by yet another Notification No. G.S.R. 318(E) of even date, issued by the Central Government in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training), New Delhi, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the said Act, the jurisdiction of the Jammu Bench of the Tribunal, was specified to be the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh. In short, the Act of 1985 stands extended to the two Union Territories (UTs) and a Bench thereof stands established at Jammu for the two Union Territories.

10. Admittedly, the subject matter of the Writ petition filed by the appellant before the learned Single Judge is the recruitment process concerning the civil post borne on the service of the Government of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Section 14 of the Act of 1985 falls in Chapter III, captioned jurisdiction, powers and authority of Tribunals. It reads as under:

"14. Jurisdiction, powers and authority of the Central Administrative Tribunal-- (1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the Central Administrative Tribunal shall exercise, on and from the appointed day, all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable immediately before that day by all courts, except the Supreme Court, in relation to--

(a) recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, to any All-India Service or to any civil service of the Union or a civil post under the Union or to a post connected with defence or in the defence services, being, in either case, a post filled by a civilian;

(b) all service matters concerning--

(i) a member of any All-India Service; or

(ii) a person, not being a member of an All-India Service or a person referred to in clause (c), appointed to any civil service of the Union or any civil post under the Union; or

(iii) a civilian, not being a member of an All-India Service or a person referred to in clause (c), appointed to any defence services or a post connected with defence; and pertaining to the service of such member, person or civilian, in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or of any local or other authority within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India or of any corporation or society owned or controlled by the Government;

(c) all service matters pertaining to service in connection with the affairs of the Union concerning a person appointed to any service or post referred to in sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) of clause (b), being a person whose services have been placed by a State Government or any local or other authority or any corporation 4 [or society] or other body, at the disposal of the Central Government for such appointment. Explanation-- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that references to 'Union' in this sub-section shall be construed as including references also to a Union territory.

(2) The Central Government may, by notification, apply with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification the provisions of sub-section (3) to local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India and to corporations or societies owned or controlled by Government, not being a local or other authority or corporation or society controlled or owned by a State Government Provided that if the Central Government considers it expedient so to do for the purpose of facilitating transition to the scheme as envisaged by this Act, different dates may be so specified under this sub-section in respect of different classes of, or different categories under any class of, local or other authorities or corporations or societies.

(3) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the Central Administrative Tribunal shall also exercise, on and from the date with effect from which the provisions of this sub-section apply to any local or other authority or corporation or society, all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable immediately before that date by all courts, except the Supreme Court, in relation to--

(a) recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, to any service or post in connection with the affairs of such local or other authority or corporation or society; and

(b) all service matters concerning a person, other than a person referred to in clause

(a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1), appointed to any service or post in connection with the affairs of such local or other authority or corporation or society and pertaining to the service of such person in connection with such affairs."

It is, thus, seen that Section 14, delineating the matters in relation with which the Tribunals have been prescribed to have the jurisdiction, speaks of recruitment, and matters concerning recruitment, inter alia, to any civil service of the Union or a civil post under the Union. The word 'Union' in terms of Explanation appended under Section 14(1)(c) has reference also to a Union Territory. The words used are 'civil service' or 'civil post'. The subject matter of the Writ petition filed by the petitioner/ appellant herein relates to a duly sanctioned post borne on a Civil Service of the Union Territory of the Jammu and Kashmir and meets all the requirements of being a civil post. That being the position, the claim of the petitioner/ appellant herein, admittedly, relates to the recruitment and/or matters concerning recruitment to a civil service and/order a civil post under the Union. Consequently, in terms of the mandate of Section 14 of the Act of 1985, it is the Central Administrative Tribunal which has the jurisdiction as a Court of first instance to exercise all the jurisdiction, powers and authority vis-à-vis the petition filed by the petitioner/ appellant before the learned Single Judge, which were exercisable by this Court prior to the appointed day.

11. Apart from the above, in case titled 'Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. v. Subhash Sharma etc.', reported as 'AIR SCW 2002 (2) 1105', a Constitutional Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was called upon to deal with an issue similar to the one involved herein this appeal and the Constitutional Bench, at Paragraphs 12 and 13, clearly laid down as:

"12. The Constitution Bench of this Court has clearly held that Tribunals set up under the Act shall continue to act as the only courts of first instance 'in respect of areas of law for which they have been constituted'. It was further held that it will not be open for litigants to directly approach the High Court even in cases where they question the vires of statutory legislation (except where the legislation which creates the particular Tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned Tribunal.

13. In view of the clear pronouncement of this Court, the High Court erred in law in directly entertaining the writ petitions concerning service matters of the employees of the Kendriya Vidyalaya as these matters come under the jurisdiction of the Administrative Tribunal. We, therefore, hold that the High Court committed an error by declining to transfer the writ petition to the Central Administrative Tribunal. Consequently, we set aside the impugned orders and direct the High Court to transfer both the writ petitions to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench which may, in its turn, make over the case to the circuit bench in the State of Jammu and Kashmir for disposal in accordance with law."

From the above position of law enunciated by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, it becomes axiomatic that the Tribunals set up under the Act of 1985 have been tasked to act as the only courts of first instance in respect of areas of law for which they have been constituted and the litigants have been restrained to directly approach the High Court even in cases where they question the vires of statutory legislation, except where the legislation which creates the particular Tribunal is challenged, by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned Tribunal.

Consequently, in these circumstances, the learned Single Judge could not have entertained a petition raising a service dispute of the employee borne on the service of the Government of India or the Government of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh."

Having regard to the decision rendered by this Court, the post under

reference being civil post, is squarely covered for the jurisdiction of the CAT

Bench, Srinagar.

In view of above, the instant writ petition is allowed and the order

passed by the CAT Bench, Srinagar, on 6th December, 2021 is set aside with

direction to the CAT Bench, Srinagar, to decide the OA afresh on merits.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in case the

petitioners are not allowed to appear in the written examination for the post of

Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies, advertised in terms of

advertisement notice dated 11.05.2021, till the matter is decided by the CAT

Bench, Srinagar, the petition will become infructuous as the exams are

scheduled to be held on 12.12.2021.

We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the

petitioners and are of considered view that the petitioners have made out a

case for interim relief, therefore, we direct the respondents 2 to 4 to allow the

petitioners to appear in the written examination for the post of Assistant

Registrar, Cooperative Societies, advertised in terms of advertisement Notice

No. 05-PSC(DR-P) of 2021 dated 11.05.2021, on their own risk and

responsibility.

Registry to send down a copy of this order to CAT Bench, Srinagar, for

compliance.

Disposed of along with connected CM(s).

                               (Mohd Akram Chowdhary)          (Ali Mohammad Magrey)
                                        Judge                            Judge
           SRINAGAR
           10.12.2021
           "Mohammad Yasin Dar"




MOHAMMAD YASIN DAR
2021.12.10 15:24
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter