Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6076 HP
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8824 of 2025 Decided on: 27th May, 2025
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bimla Devi .....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others .....Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner seeks benefits of the decision
rendered in Satya Devi Versus State of H.P. and others2.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits
that the judgment in Satya Devi's2 case has been assailed
by the respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil)
No.20496/2024. The common decision passed in several
other matters connected with Satya Devi's2 case has also
been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special
Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh &
Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 28.05.2024
Ors. Vs. Inder Pal3. Copy of an order passed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court on 24.03.2025 in several connected
Special Leave Petitions with lead case State of Himachal
Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal3 was perused, which reads
as under:-
"1. Delay condoned.
2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters.
3. Tag alongwith SLP(C) No.20496/2024.
4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed."
In view of the fact that operation of impugned
order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28.05.2024) in all
connected Special Leave Petitions has been stayed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court, this writ petition is disposed of with
direction that benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner
under Satya Devi's2 case, shall abide by the outcome of the
Inder Pal's3 case instituted by the respondents against the
common judgment rendered in Satya Devi's2 case. Pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
May 27, 2025 Judge
Mukesh
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.11306/2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!