Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15436 HP
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7658 of 2024 and connected matters Decided on: 22.10.2024 _________________________________________________________________
1. CWP No.7658 of 2024
Kamaljeet Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
2. CWP No.7659 of 2024
Vinod Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
3. CWP No.7660 of 2024
Hem Raj ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Saro Devi ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Onkar Nath ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Joginder Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Sher Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ramesh Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Thakur Dev ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Roshan Lal ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Pawan Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Uttam Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Krishan Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ram Lal ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Balbinder Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Chaman Lal ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Ramesh Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Om Prakash ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Amrit Lal ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Parshotam Dass ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Raj Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Salig Ram ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents ____________________________________________________________
Mast Ram ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Baldev Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Harnam Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Roop Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Tilak Raj ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Bhagat Ram ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Krishan Lal ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Prittam Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Sansar Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Sarvan Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Jai Karan ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Om Prakash ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Sansar Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Ram Bilas ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Susheela ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Rajender Prasad ....Petitioner
Versus
HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Surinder Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Gurdeep Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Narain Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Banti Devi ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Swaroop Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Hans Raj ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Yudhbir Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Harbhajan Singh ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Prakash Chand ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Lajya Devi ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________
Desh Raj ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Roshni Devi ....Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,
Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________________
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate in all the matters.
For the respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K.Vashisht, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned Standing
Counsel, waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents.
2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the
parties, the matters are heard at this stage.
3. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents
for grant of pension allowance at 5%, 10% and 15% of the
basic pension/family pension on attaining the age of 65
years, 70 years and 75 years, respectively.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
similar issue was decided by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh
Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 2929 of 2015 ( Sh. Brij
Lal and others Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another).
That O.A. was disposed of with a direction to the
respondents (therein) to release arrears of due and
admissible dearness relief and pension allowance of 5%, 10%
and 15% on attaining the age of 65 years, 70 years and 75
years by the concerned retirees. Reference in this regard was
made to Annexure P-1.
It was further submitted that CWP No.8670 of
2023, preferred by the Himachal Road Transport Corporation
(respondent herein) against the aforesaid decision of the
tribunal was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on
07.11.2023. Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No(s). 50794 of
2023, field by the HRTC against the judgment dated
07.11.2023, passed in CWP No. 8670 of 2023, was dismissed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court on 25.01.2024.
The submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioners is that in view of the aforesaid decision,
respondent-Corporation is liable to release the pension
allowance at different slabs of 5%, 10% and 15% on
petitioners' attaining the age of 65 years, 70 years and 75
years. It has further been submitted that the petitioners'
representations for redressal of this issue have not been
attended by the respondent. Hence, these Writ petitions.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the
petitioners would be content if the cases of the petitioners are
considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid
judgments within a time bound schedule. Learned counsel
for the respondents has no objection for this prayer.
Having regard to above submissions all the
petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to
consider the respective cases of the petitioners in light of the
aforesaid judgments and pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived
at, shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also
to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge October 22, 2024 Ankit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!