Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3607 HP
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 1585 of 2021
Decided on: 05.08.2021
____________________________________________________________
.
Dr. Kushal Kumar ....Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ..Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
1
Whether approved for reporting? No
______________________________________________________
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate
For the respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl.
Advocate General.
For the respondent No.4: Mr. Divya Raj Singh Thakur,
Advocate.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Admittedly, the transfer of the petitioner has been
effected on the basis of D.O. Note.
2. Once that be so, then in terms of the judgment
rendered by this Court in CWP No. 801 of 2013, titled as
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Sanjay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on
05.07.2013, the impugned transfer order is not sustainable
in the eyes of law.
.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and
the transfer order, dated 09.03.2021(AnnexureP2) is
quashed and set aside. However, since the petitioner has
completed his normal tenure of service at the given station,
this order shall not prevent the official respondents from
considering the case of the petitioner for transfer, which, of
course, shall have to be in accordance with law. Pending
application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
Copy dasti.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
(Satyen Vaidya)
August 05, 2021 Judge
(himani/pankaj)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!