[Cites 2, Cited by 0]
Gujarat High Court
Thakor Aditji Ashokji vs Staet Of Gujarat on 30 March, 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7353/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
CHARGESHEET) NO. 7353 of 2026
==========================================================
THAKOR ADITJI ASHOKJI
Versus
STAET OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AKASHKUMAR H PATEL(12877) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KRUTIK PARIKH, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
DESAI
Date : 30/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on
behalf of the respondent-State.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the
respondent-State.
3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the
applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11206023250568 of 2025 registered with Kheralu Police Station,
Mahesana, for the offence punishable under Sections 317(4),
319(2), 318(4), 61(2) of of the BNS and Sections 66 (C) and 66(D)
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7353/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026
undefined
of the Information Technology Act.
4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,
considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of
the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular
bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,
further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the
Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that,
the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions
that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.
5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to
the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking
to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present
applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may
not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the
application may be dismissed.
6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are
considered:-
i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Mahesana
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7353/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026
undefined
District, hence, he would be available at the time of trial;
ii. The applicant has three antecedents, out of which
one is of similar nature, whereas the other two pertain to
rioting;
iii. No recovery or discovery is to the effected from the
applicant
iv. The amounts which were deposited by the witnesses
had gone to the account of co-accused Jigisha Denish
Kadvani;
This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.
Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering
the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the
First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in
detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on
regular bail.
8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is
ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R.
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7353/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026
undefined
No. 11206023250568 of 2025 registered with Kheralu Police
Station, Mahesana, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like
amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the
conditions that he shall;
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution;
[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a
week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file
an affidavit to that effect;
[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior
permission of the Sessions Court concerned;
[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O.
and also to the Court at the time of execution of the
bond and shall not change his residence without
prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;
[f] mark presence on every Monday before the concerned
police station till the trial is over;
9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7353/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026
undefined
required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the
Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate
action in accordance with law.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions
in accordance with law.
11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be
influenced by any observations of this Court which are of
preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of
enlarging the applicant on regular bail.
12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
Vikramsinh Amarsinh
