Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2221 Guj
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
R/CR.MA/24028/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/03/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 24028 of 2022
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2610 of 2022
With
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2610 of 2022
==========================================================
PATEL NAUTAMBHAI PRAVINBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANISH S SHAH(5859) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS. ASMITA PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 13/03/2023
ORAL ORDER
ORDER IN R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 24028 of 2022 In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2610 of 2022
1. RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of
notice of rule on behalf of the respondent-state.
2. This application is filed for grant of Leave to Appeal against the
judgment and order dated 18-11-2022 passed by the Judicial
Magistrate First Class, Prantij, Sabarkantha in Criminal Case No.794
R/CR.MA/24028/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/03/2023
of 2019.
3. By the aforesaid judgment and order, the respondent-accused was
acquitted for the offence under Section-138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act.
4. Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the acquittal
is on account of holding that the respondent-accused had
successfully rebutted the presumption as issuance of the cheque
and signature thereto has not been disputed. However, error is
committed in concluding that no legally enforceable debt is there,
only on the ground that the cheques were issued, at the time when
agricultural land was taken on rent for carrying out agricultural
activities and for that purpose, account was already settled before
the cheque was deposited.
5. Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that for this
purpose, neither any witnesses were examined that account has
been settled and that the cheques were issued towards the security
of land given on rent to the son of the respondent-accused.
Therefore, in absence of any such evidence, presumption cannot be
said to have been rebutted successfully.
6. In view of the aforesaid, sufficient ground is made out for grant of
Leave to Appeal.
R/CR.MA/24028/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/03/2023
7. In view of the aforesaid, Leave to Appeal is granted. Accordingly,
present Criminal Misc. Application stands allowed. Rule is made
absolute accordingly.
=========================================
ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2610 of 2022
1. The Appeal is admitted.
2. Issue bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five
Thousand only) against the respondent- original accused.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J) PARESH SOMPURA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!