Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Administrative Officer vs Waghela Jayaben Govindbhai
2023 Latest Caselaw 4500 Guj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4500 Guj
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2023

Gujarat High Court
Administrative Officer vs Waghela Jayaben Govindbhai on 15 June, 2023
Bench: J. C. Doshi
       C/LPA/722/2023                                   ORDER DATED: 15/06/2023




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.           722 of 2023

        In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9022 of 2017
                              With
          CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 2 of 2022
           In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 722 of 2023
==========================================================
                           ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
                                   Versus
                         WAGHELA JAYABEN GOVINDBHAI
==========================================================
Appearance:
DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(7781) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
==========================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
           and
           HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                                Date : 15/06/2023

                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Dipak Khanchandnani for the appellant.

2. The appellant is Administrative Officer, Bhavnagar Municipal School Board-respondent no.3 in the Special Civil Application, has preferred this Letters Patent Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent seeking to call in question the judgment and order dated 23.09.2022 of learned Single Judge.

2.1 Thereby, writ petition of the original petitioners-respondents herein, came to be allowed by directing the respondent authorities including the

C/LPA/722/2023 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2023

appellant herein to consider the case of each of the petitioners for payment of pension and retirement benefits, including family pension to the legal heirs, if any, with interest at the rate of 6% from the date of superannuation till the date of payment as also to the extent other retirement benefits, as may be admissible.

3. Stated in nutshell, the case of the original petitioners was that they had been serving as Peons under the Bhavnagar Municipal School Board (Bhavnagar Prathmik Shikshan Samiti) - Appellant herein. They retired from service the upon reaching the age of superannuation on 30.04.2013, 30.06.2016 and 31.10.2016 respectively.

3.1 Their grievance was that despite passage of four years after retirement, they were not paid their retirement dues such as pension, gratuity, leave salary, commuted pension and group insurance etc. With such grievance, the petition was filed. In the said petition, respondent no.1 was State of Gujarat, respondent no.2 was Director of Primary Education whereas, respondent no.3 was Administrative Officer, Bhavnagar Municipal School Board.

3.2 It may be stated that while the present appeal is by respondent no.3-Administrative Officer, Bhavnagar Municipal School Board, similarly situated employees of appellant Board had filed other

C/LPA/722/2023 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2023

petitions, which were in group being Special Civil Application No.6243 of 2008 and allied petitions wherein the grievance was identical and the prayers were similar. Those were also the employees of Municipal School Board and made similar prayers for grant of pension and other retirement benefits.

3.3 It may be stated that against the said group of petitions, which included Special Civil Application No. 9022 of 2017 from which this appeal arises, the Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation had preferred Letters Patent Appeal No.49 of 2023 and allied appeals, which came to be dismissed by the Division Bench on 10.04.2023.

4. It was fairly submitted by learned advocate for the appellant that since issues involved in all the cases are identical, that the petitioners are similarly situated and that the present appellant- Municipal School Board has identity of interest with the Corporation whose appeals have been dismissed and further that no other or further submissions and contentions are to be canvassed, the outcome of the present Letters Patent Appeal will be guided by the decision dated 10.04.2023 in the aforesaid Letters Patent Appeal No. 49 of 2023 and allied matters.

5. The Division Bench held dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal, as under,

C/LPA/722/2023 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2023

"7.5 We have also gone through the GR dated 24.11.1988, issued by the Education Department of the State of Gujarat. A perusal of the said GR reveals that State Government had decided to grant pension to non-teaching staff of various authorized municipal school boards within the State and Clause-2 thereof, specifically provides that the authorized municipalities / municipal corporations, who will give the above benefit to their non-teaching staff of Municipal School Board, will be eligible for the admission grant towards the State Government share on pension contribution only.

7.5.1 Now, it is the case of the appellants that the State Government is not providing admission grant towards the State Government's share on pension contribution, and therefore, they are financially not in a position to grant pension and other retiral benefits to the private opponents, herein.

7.5.2 So far as the non-payment of admission grant by the State Government towards its share on pension contribution is concerned, it is always open to the appellants to take appropriate steps, in accordance with law, but, at the same time, by that reason alone, the appellants cannot deprive the private opponents of the benefits, which they are entitled to get.

7.6 We have also gone through the impugned judgment and order, Dated: 23.09.2022, where, the learned Single Judge, after taking into consideration various decisions of the Apex Court as well as of this Court, has specifically held that the private opponents are entitled to get pension and other retiral benefits along with interest at six per cent per annum.

7.7 In view of the above discussion, we are of the considered view that the learned Single Judge has committed no error in passing the common CAV judgment and order dated 23.09.2022."

C/LPA/722/2023 ORDER DATED: 15/06/2023

6. The above reasoning and findings apply and operate to the present challenge also.

7. In view of the above position emerging, the present Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed.

In view of the dismissal of the main Letters Patent Appeal, the Civil Application would not survive and is disposed of.

(N.V.ANJARIA, J)

(J. C. DOSHI,J) BIJOY B. PILLAI

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter