Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Heirs Of Deceased Jaydipsinh ... vs Bharatsinh Prabhatsinh Jadeja
2022 Latest Caselaw 600 Guj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 600 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2022

Gujarat High Court
Heirs Of Deceased Jaydipsinh ... vs Bharatsinh Prabhatsinh Jadeja on 18 January, 2022
Bench: Hemant M. Prachchhak
      C/FA/4934/2010                               ORDER DATED: 18/01/2022




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4934 of 2010

==========================================================
     HEIRS OF DECEASED JAYDIPSINH GUNUBHAI JADEJA, VIMLABA
                        JAYDIP & 3 other(s)
                             Versus
            BHARATSINH PRABHATSINH JADEJA & 1 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NITIN M AMIN(126) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4
MR VC THOMAS(5476) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
RULE SERVED(64) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.
       PRACHCHHAK

                               Date : 18/01/2022

                                ORAL ORDER

1. The present appeal is filed by the original claimants for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Jamnagar dated 15.09.2010 in MACP No. 245 of 2000.

2. The brief facts of the present case are as under.

2.1. On 05.01.2000, the husband of appellant No.1 was going as pillion rider on the motorcycle bearing registration No. GJ-3- HH - 4123, which was driven by one Devendrasinh Prabhatsinh Jadeja. When they reached near curve of village Kharedi, the motorcycle slipped, as a result of which, the husband of appellant No.1 received serious injuries and succumbed to the injuries. After seven days, the husband of appellant No.1 was died.

C/FA/4934/2010 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2022

3. Learned advocate for the appellants has submitted that the Tribunal has awarded the compensation on the lower side mainly on the ground of the medical expenses, pain shock and suffering and even consortium etc. It is submitted that the judgement and award passed by the Tribunal is erroneous and unjustified in awarding less compensation than what is claimed.

4. I have heard Mr. Nitin Amin, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. V.C. Thomas, learned advocate for respondent No.2 - Insurance Company through the Video Conference. Respondent No. 1 is served, none appears on his behalf.

5. I have perused the record and proceedings and I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, considering the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of (i) Sarla Verma and others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another reported in (2009) 6 SCC 1211, (ii) National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, (iii) Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram and others reported in (2018) 18 SCC 130 and (iv) United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and others reported in 2020 SC 620, the present appeal requires to be allowed to the extent that the appellants are entitled to get additional amount of Rs. 90,000/- at the rate of 6% per annum.

6. In view of the above, I proceed to pass the following

C/FA/4934/2010 ORDER DATED: 18/01/2022

order :

6.1 The present appeal is partly allowed.

6.2 The impugned award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Jamnagar dated 15.09.2010 in MACP No. 245 of 2000 is hereby modified and in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, a sum of Rs. 90,000/ as additional amount with interests at the rate of 6%. per annum is awarded which shall be from the date of petition till date of payment or deposit whichever is earlier.

6.3 The Insurance Company is directed to deposit enhanced amount of compensation with interest at the rate of 6% as early as possible within an outer limit of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

6.4 The apportionment and order for disbursement as made by the Tribunal in the operative portion of the order, shall hold good for the additional amount of compensation.

6.5 Decree be drawn accordingly.

Record and Proceedings be sent back to the concerned Tribunal forthwith. Pending Civil Applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) SALIM/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter