Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6923 Gua
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010076462018
2025:GAU-AS:11792
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/195/2018
MAHENDRA NATH MAHANTA AND 12 ORS.
ASSTT TEACHER, RAJAPUL L P SCHOOL, NAZIRA, SUB DIVISION,
SIVASAGAR
2: CHITTARANJAN BORGOHAIN
ASSTT. TEACHER
PHULONIBARI L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA
SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
3: AJIT KALITA
ASSTT. TEACHER
215 NO. CHANBASHA L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION SIVASAGAR
4: AMULYA DUTTA
ASSTT. TEACHER
BAHBARI MAZDOOR L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
5: KAMAL BAILUNG
ASSTT. TEACHER
NO. 981 NAGAON L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
6: RAJU KONWAR
ASSTT. TEACHER
OUGURIJAN L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
Page No.# 2/4
7: RANTUMONI KHANIKAR
ASSTT. TEACHER
TOM TOM TALA L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
8: LAKHESWAR DAS
ASSTT. TEACHER
653 NO. MOLAGAON(2) L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
9: PADMESWAR GOGOI
ASSTT. TEACHER
SAH SRAMIK GYANJYOTI L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
10: MAHENDRA GOGOI
ASSTT. TEACHER
NAGA GAON L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
11: MRIDUPABAN GOSWAMI
ASSTT. TEACHER
BENGMURIA KONWAR GAON L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
12: BOLIN CH BARUAH
ASSTT. TEACHER
BALIGHAT TRIBAL L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGAR
13: SUDARSHAN PRASAD
ASSTT. TEACHER
6 NO. LAKHIMIJAN L P SCHOOL
NAZIRA SUB DIVISION
SIVASAGA
VERSUS
SRI PREETOM SAIKIA AND ANR.
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, GOVT OF
ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
Page No.# 3/4
2:NARAYAN KONWAR
IAS
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GOSWAMI, MR. A KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-2), MR S M T CHISTIE(R-2)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
ORDER
Date : 02.09.2025
Heard Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. U. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors.
Mr. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors has produced the judgment and order dated 16.07.2025, passed by this Court, in WP(C) No. 6435/2017 and other connected writ petition, and submits that the order dated 18.12.2017, was an interim order passed in the aforementioned petitions and the said writ petitions have finally been disposed of, vide judgment and order dated 16.07.2025, and as such, the interim order stands merged with the final judgment and order dated 16.07.2025, and consequently, this contempt petition becomes infructuous and accordingly, it is contended to close the same.
Taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, and also considering the fact that WP(C) No. 6435/2017 and another connected writ Page No.# 4/4
petition had already been disposed of, vide judgment and order dated 16.07.2025, and the interim order dated 18.12.2017, stands merged with the final judgment and order dated 16.07.2025, this contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!