Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs Mamata Hojai
2025 Latest Caselaw 1051 Gua

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1051 Gua
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/4 vs Mamata Hojai on 15 July, 2025

Author: Michael Zothankhuma
Bench: Michael Zothankhuma
                                                                           Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010204482022




                                                                     2025:GAU-AS:9074

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                               Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/565/2022

            SHANTANU KUMAR DAS
            S/O- LT. SUKUMAR DAS,
            R/O. A.C. SEN ROAD,
            P.O./ P.S.- KARIMGANJ,
            DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM,
            PIN NO.- 788710.



            VERSUS

            MAMATA HOJAI, A.E.S. AND ANR
            THE DIRECTOR, GOVT. OF ASSAM,
            SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM,
            KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI- 781019.

            2:ANUP KUMAR DAS
            THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS
             CDC

            KARIMGANJ DISTRICT CIRCLE
            KARIMGANJ

            P.O- AND DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ.
            ASSAM
             PIN- 788710

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS N SAIKIA, MRS. P GOSWAMI

Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE (R1), MR. D SAIKIA (R1)
                                                                         Page No.# 2/4

                                BEFORE
              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                      ORDER

15.07.2025

Heard Mr. M.Z. Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. N. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This Court, vide interim order dated 09.09.2022 passed in WP(C) No. 5914/2022, had suspended the impugned order dated 26.08.2022 issued by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam, allowing the respondent No.5 therein to hold the charge of Principal of Budhan H.S. School, Karimganj District till the next returnable date.

3. Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that WP(C) No. 5914/2022 had been disposed of vide judgment and order dated 18.04.2024 and in terms of the said judgment and order, this Court had held that the petitioner did not have the requisite eligibility criteria under Rule 12(3) of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialized School) Rules, 2018 to hold the charge of the post of Principal of the school. However, in view of the submission made by the petitioner's counsel in WP(C) No. 5914/2022, the Director of Secondary Education, Assam was to examine whether the respondent No.5 fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Principal and if it was found that the respondent No.5 was eligible to be recruited to the post of Principal, the respondent No.5 would be allowed to continue to hold the charge of the post of the Principal of the school till a regular incumbent was recruited against the said post.

4. Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 has produced the Order No.E-505261/253 dated 16.07.2024, issued by the Director of Page No.# 3/4

Secondary Education, Assam, which shows that the respondent No.5 in WP(C) No. 5914/2022 has been allowed to hold the charge of Principal of the said school in addition to her normal duties as Hindi Teacher under F.R. 49(C).

5. The judgment and order dated 18.04.2024 disposing of WP(C) No.5914/2022 has not been made a part of the record by the petitioner, inasmuch as, the contempt petition is against the interim order only. The petitioner not having the eligibility criteria for recruitment to the post Principal, there is no question of contempt being made out against the respondents in terms of the interim order dated 09.09.2022 passed in WP(C) No. 5914/2022.

6. Paragraph Nos. 13 & 14 of the judgment and order dated 18.04.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 5914/2022 states as follows:-

"13. Having considered the rival submissions as made by the parties, this Court in view of the conclusions as reached hereinabove is of the considered view that the petitioner having not acquired the requisite eligibility criteria as mandated under the provisions of Rule 12(3) of the said Rules of 2018 was rightly not allowed by the respondent authorities to hold the charge of the post of Principal of the said School and the same cannot be said to be erroneous and it does not call for any interference by this Court. However, considering the submissions made by Ms. N. Saikia questioning the eligibility of the Respondent No.5 to hold the post of Principal in the said school, this Court while not interfering with the order dated 26.08.2022 directs the Director of Secondary Education, Assam to examine as to whether the respondent No.5 herein fulfills the eligibility criteria as mandated for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Principal and upon such examination being made and on satisfaction drawn that the respondent No.5 is eligible in terms of the provisions of Rule 12(3) of the Rules of 2018 for recruitment to the post of principal of the school in question, shall proceed to allow the said respondent No.5 to continue to hold the charge of the post of Page No.# 4/4

Principal of the School in question in terms of the order dated 26.08.2022 till a regular incumbent is so recruited against the said post. Till the above exercise is completed, the jurisdictional Inspector of Schools shall be allowed to continue to hold the charge of the said post.

14. The said exercise be initiated and concluded by the Director of the Secondary Education, Assam and appropriate orders passed thereon within a period of 1 (one) month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order either from the petitioner herein or from the respondent no.5."

7. The Order No.E-505261/253 dated 16.07.2024 issued by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam is made a part of the record and marked as Annexure-X.

8. In view of paragraph No. 13 of the judgment and order dated 18.04.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 5914/2022 and Annexure-X, no case of contempt has been made out. The contempt petition is accordingly closed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter