Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 8642 Gua

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8642 Gua
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2024

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Union Of India on 25 November, 2024

                                                                            Page No.# 1/4

GAHC010238582024




                                                                  undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : MFA/60/2024

            PHULESWARI CHUTIA AND 4 ORS
            W/O. LATE LEKHAN CHUTIA

            2: DEBEE CHUTIA
             D/O. LATE LEKHAN CHUTIA

            3: PRIYANKA CHUTIA
             D/O. LATE LEKHAN CHUTIA

            4: SADANANDA CHUTIA
             D/O. LATE LEKHAN CHUTIA

            5: SANGITA CHUTIA
             D/O. LATE LEKHAN CHUTIA
            ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. KHANGIA CHHAPORI
             P/O. LAGUABORAH
             P/S. DHEMAJI
             DIST. DHEMAJI
             PIN-787053
            ASSAM

            VERSUS

            THE UNION OF INDIA
            REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY, MUMBAI.



Advocate for the Petitioner   : J.P. BARUAH, MR. S SUTRADHAR,MS N RAFIQUE

Advocate for the Respondent : ,
                                                                          Page No.# 2/4



                                    BEFORE
                       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

                                         ORDER

Date : 25.11.2024

Heard Mr. J.P. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellants.

2. This appeal, under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, is directed against the judgment and award dated 14.08.2024, passed by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in OAIIu-60/2023.

3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and award dated 14.08.2024, the learned Tribunal had directed the respondent authority to pay a sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- in the claim petition preferred by the appellants herein, on account of death of Late Lekhan Chutia at Amalsad Railway Station and also directed to apportion the amount as under:

(i)      Smt. Phuleswari Chutia             -     Rs. 4,50,000/-
(ii)     Smt. Debee Chutia Mudoi            -     Rs. 50,000/-
(iii)     Smt. Priyanka Chutia              -     Rs. 1,00,000/-
(iv) Shri Sadananda Chutia                  -     Rs. 1,00,000/-
(v)      Smt. Sangita Chutia                -     Rs. 1,00,000/-

4. The learned Tribunal further directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in the account of the appellant No. 1 though RTGS/NEFT transfer and the remaining 3,50,000/- to be invested in seven FDRs of Rs. 50,000/- each for one to seven years, and also directed that the entire amount of compensation of Rs. 50,000/- payable to Smt. Debee Chutia Mudoi be invested in her name in a nationalized bank as fixed deposit for a period of three years and the entire amount of compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- each payable to Smt. Priyanka Chutia, Shri Sadananda Chutia and Smt. Sangita Chutia be invested in their Page No.# 3/4

names in a nationalized bank as fixed deposit for a period of three years. It was also directed that the awarded amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- will carry pendente lite interest @ 6% per annum from date of registration of the claim petition i.e. 15.02.2023 and the interest will be 9% on account of failing to pay the same within 90 days of the receipt of the order.

5. Mr. Baruah, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the only grievance of the appellants is that the entire amount in respect of the appellant Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 was directed to be invested as fixed deposit in a nationalized bank and the sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- of the appellant No. 1 was directed to be invested as fixed deposit in a nationalized bank, and all the appellants are major and because of the aforementioned direction for fixed deposit, the appellants are facing much inconvenience and therefore, it is contended to release the entire amount in their favour. In support of his submission, Mr. Baruah has referred to an order of this Court, dated 10.05.2024, in MFA No. 64/2023.

6. Having heard the submission of learned counsel for the appellants, and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, especially the submission of Mr. Baruah that all the appellants are major and the direction was given by the learned Tribunal for fixed depositing the entire amount in respect of appellant Nos. 2 to 5 and also the sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- in respect of the appellant No. 1, that caused much inconvenience to them, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal by directing the learned Tribunal to release the entire amount in favour of the appellants.

7. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated 14.08.2024, stands modified to the extent as indicated above.

Page No.# 4/4

8. In terms of above, this appeal stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter