Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4600 Gua
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2022
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010219452022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/167/2022
SHANKAR DAS
S/O LATE PRAHLAD DAS,
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI, BARPETA TOWN, MOUZA, PS AND DIST
BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
KUMADINI DAS AND ORS.
D/O LATE GALIN DAS,
W/O CHITTARANJAN DAS,
RESIDENT OF KALAYAHATI, SUNDARIDIA, BARPETA, MOUZA AND DIST
BARPETA, ASSAM 781314
2:SARASWATI DAS
D/O LATE GILIN DAS
W/O LATE GUNESWAR DAS
RESIDENT OF NAKHRA
NOTUN BANIKUCHI
MOUZA TIHU
DIST NALBARI
ASSAM 781371
REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY CHANDAN KUMAR DAS
S/O LATE TARANI KANTA DAS
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781301
3:TARAK BHARALI
Page No.# 2/4
S/O LATE CHAKRADHAR BHARALI
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI
BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA
PO AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781301
4:KHAGEN BHARALI
S/O LATE CHAKRADHAR BHARALI
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI
BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA
PO AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781301
5:NABA BHARALI
S/O LATE CHAKRADHAR BHARALI
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI
BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA
PO AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781301
6:NIRU BHARALI
D/O LATE CHAKRADHAR BHARALI
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI
BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA
PO AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 781301
7:SABITA BHARALI
D/O LATE CHAKRADHAR BHARALI
RESIDENT OF KUMARHATI
BARPETA WARD NO. 5
MOUZA
PO AND DIST BARPETA
ASSAM 78130
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HAQUE
Page No.# 3/4
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
21.11.2022 Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel for the appellant.
This appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. has been preferred against the impugned Judgment and Decree, dated 08.07.2022, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Barpeta in T.A. No. 12/2019, thereby affirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 10.06.2019, passed by the learned Munsiff No. 1, Barpeta, in T.S. No. 120/2013.
The appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law-
1. Whether the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Courts below declaring title and recovery of possession over suit land in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents is nullity as the suit land had already been sold out by the original pattadar (predecessor of plaintiffs) by registered sale deed (Ext- B) in favour of one Nripendra Nath Das who was even not impleaded in the suit under Order I Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code?
2. Whether the certified copy of the registered sale deed (Ext-B) is required to be proved under Section 67 and 68 of the Evidence Act without having any objection with regard to admissibility and contents of the sale deed?
3. Whether mutation entry made by the learned Circle Officer, Barpeta vide order dated 09.09.2005 in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents Page No.# 4/4
confer any title?
The appellant is permitted to raise any other substantial question of law which may arise in course of hearing.
Call for the records.
Issue notice. Steps be taken by registered post with A/D within 5(five) days.
List after 4(four) weeks.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!