Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2218 Gua
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022
Page No.# 1/5
GAHC010126132022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4281/2022
BASANTA KUMAR PAIT AND 5 ORS
SON OF SRI RAJEN PAIT, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 171, NIZARAPARA,
HIRIMBAPUR PATH, ODALBAKRA, KAMRUP(M), P.O. ODALBAKRA, PIN-
781034, ASSAM.
2: KULDIP BARMAN
SON OF SRI DILIP BARMAN
RESIDENT OF H.NO.- 18
NANDANPUR PATH
SURVEY
BELTOLA
PIN- 781028
ASSAM.
3: FRANKY KUMAR KALIA
SON OF NIRMAL KUMAR KALIA
RESIDENT OF LAL BANGLOW ROAD
TINSUKIA
PIN- 786125
ASSAM.
4: DHRUVA JYOTI BORUAH
SON OF LATE MANIK CHANDRA BARUAH
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O.- KALOOGAON
DISTRICT SIVASAGAR
PIN- 785666
ASSAM.
5: PARTHA PRATIM DEORI
SON OF SRI TANU RAM DEORI
RESIDENT OF RATANPUR
P.O.- DHEMAJI
DISTRICT- DHEMAJI
PIN- 787057
Page No.# 2/5
ASSAM.
6: PANKAJ KUMAR RAJKUMAR
SON OF SRI INDRESWAR RAJBONGSHI
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SOLMARI
DISTRICT- MORIGAON
PIN- 782105
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN,
DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
COMMISSIONERATE OF TRANSPORT
PARIBAHAN BHAWAN
JAWAHARNAGAR
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-22.
3:THE SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
JANATA BHAWAN
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
4:THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
JAWAHARNAGAR
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-22
ASSAM.
5:THE UNDER SECRETARY
ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
JAWAHARNAGAR
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-22
ASSAM.
6:THE JOINT SECRETARY
ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
JAWAHARNAGAR
KHANAPARA
Page No.# 3/5
GUWAHATI-22
ASSAM.
7:THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION
ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
JAWAHARNAGAR
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI-22
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, TRANSPORT
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
O R D E R
27.06.2022
Heard Mr. UK Nair, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Ms. MB Bora, learned counsel for the respondents in the Transport Department of the Government of Assam and Mr. BK Barman, learned counsel for the respondents in the APSC.
2. Issue notice returnable on 25.07.2022. Extra copies of the writ petition be furnished to the respective learned counsel within three days.
3. The petitioners are all Bachelor in Engineering (in short B.E) in Mechanical Engineering and intend to participate in a selection process pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.05.2022, amongst others, for the post of Motor Vehicle Inspectors (in short MVI) under the Commissionerate of Transport, Assam. The educational qualification prescribed in the advertisement is HSLC/ HSSLC with three years diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering from a recognized institute of the Government of Assam/Government of India and also duly Page No.# 4/5
recognized by the AICTE. The method for application adopted was online method.
4. The applications of the petitioners were not accepted by the system inasmuch as, where the qualification prescribed is diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering, the petitioners are B.E in Mechanical Engineering.
5. Ms. MB Bora, learned standing counsel for the Transport Department refers to the Assam Transport Service Rules, 2003, wherein in Schedule I(A), the qualification for MVI is provided as HSSLC with three years diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering. Ms. Bora also refers to the judgment of this Court rendered in Sonu Sahu and others -vs- State of Assam and others in WP(C) No. 904/2014, wherein in paragraph 35, there was a direction that in terms of an advertisement dated 05.09.2013 for the post of Draftsman/Planning Draftsman Grade-II, only those candidates who possess two years certificate course in Draftsmanship (civil) from the Government recognized institutes only are to be appointed. Accordingly, it is the submission that in the present case as the advertisement as well as the Rules provided for diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering, therefore, diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering would be eligible and any person above or below such qualification would be ineligible.
6. The said question would be decided on the next returnable date.
7. In the interim, it is provided that the respondents shall allow the petitioners to submit their application forms and may also process the same and allow the petitioners to participate, but the final results thereof shall not be declared till the next returnable date.
8. As the last date of submission of application forms through online method Page No.# 5/5
is today, in the event the system does not accept the applications of the petitioners online, such applications be accepted through the offline method.
List the matter again on 25.07.2022.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!