Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Madan Lal Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 4515 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4515 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Dr. Madan Lal Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 September, 2025

Author: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
                                                                 1




                                                                              2025:CGHC:47691
                                                                                              NAFR

                                     HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                     WPS No. 10515 of 2025
                        Dr. Madan Lal Kurre S/o Late Ghasiya Ram Kurre Aged About 48 Years
                        Working As Sports Officer At Shaheed Gundadhoor College Of Agriculture
                        And Researce Station, Kumhrawand, Jagdalpur, District- Jagdalpur At
                        Bastar ( C.G. ).
                                                                                  ... Petitioner(s)
                                                            versus
                     1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Principal Secretary Ministry Of Higher
                        Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralay, New
                        Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh.
                     2. Vice Chancellor Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya Krishak Nagar,
                        Raipur, District Raipur ( C.G. ).
                     3. The Registrar Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya Krishak Nagar, Raipur,
                        District- Raipur ( C.G. ).
                                                                             ... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapan Chandra, Advocate

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy. GA

For Respondent 2 and 3 : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17/09/2025

1. The petitioner has filed this petition assailing the order dated 18.07.2025

by which his service has been attached from Shahid Gundadhur Krishi

Digitally signed by SANTOSH SANTOSH KUMAR KUMAR SHARMA SHARMA Date:

2025.09.18 10:27:30 +0530

Mahavidyalaya and Research Center Jagdalpur to Lingo Mudiyal College

of Agriculture and Research station Narayanpur.

2. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the transfer policy does not

provide any attachment and even the government has depreciated the

practice of attaching the government servant and would pray for quashing

of the impugned order so far as it relates to the petitioner.

3. Counsel for the University would submit that the University is the

autonomous body and the circular of attachment issued by the

Government of Chhattisgarh which is not applicable to the employee as

the University is an autonomous body and the circular with respect to the

posting and transfer of the employee issued by the Government of

Chhattisgarh is not applicable to the University and looking to the

administrative exigencies he has been attached therefore, there is no

ground is available to the petitioner to challenge the order of attachment

and on the administrative exigencies he has been attached at Lingo

Mudiyal College Narayanpur, therefore, policy is not applicable to the

petitioner. He would further submit Narayanpur Agricultural College has

recently been established in the year 2019 which required sport activity

also and the petitioner is posted for last 14 years at a particular post,

therefore, for batter administration, his service is attached at Narayanpur

Agricultural College and would pray for dismissal of the petition.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

5. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, it is well settled

principle of law that the petitioner cannot insist to remain posted in a

particular place of posting for a particular period or for the entire service

period as transfer is exigency of service and the petitioner has already

remained there for 14 years at the same place, therefore, in light of

judgment of Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of SK Naushad Rahaman

& Other Vs. Union of India & Other 2020 (12) SCC 1 wherein the

Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the transfer policy does not confer

any right to the government servant to remain posted at one place for ever,

as such I am of the view that the impugned order dated 18.07.2025 does

not suffer from perversity or illegality, therefore, the petition deserves to be

dismissed and it is dismissed. No order as to cost.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

Santosh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter