Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tihlu Ram vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3004 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3004 Chatt
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Tihlu Ram vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 12 June, 2025

                                                            1




                                                                     2025:CGHC:23677

                                                                                         NAFR

                                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                                 WPS No. 4153 of 2025

                    1 - Tihlu Ram S/o Shri Tintgu Aged About 62 Years Retired 'akushal Gangman
                    Shramik' At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Pathalgaon,
                    District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Sanna, Tahsil Bagicha, District
                    Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

                    2 - Chhandana Ram S/o Shri Kura Ram Aged About 68 Years Retired 'akushal
                    Gangman Shramik' At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division
                    Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Loro, Tahsil Bagicha,
                    District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

                    3 - Sundra Ram S/o Shri Boga Ram Aged About 68 Years Retired 'akushal
                    Gangman Shramik' At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division
                    Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Sanna, Tahsil Bagicha,
                    District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

                    4 - Amrit Kujur S/o Shri Talsu Kujur Aged About 65 Years Retired 'akushal
                    Gangman Shramik' At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division
                    Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Sanna, Tahsil Bagicha,
                    District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

                    5 - Piyo Ram S/o Shri Baudha Bhagat Aged About 69 Years Retired 'akushal
                    Gangman Shramik' At Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division
                    Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Loro, Tahsil Bagicha,
                    District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                    ... Petitioner(s)

                                                         versus

                    1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works,
                    Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                    2 - Engineer In Chief Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North
                    Block, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

                    3 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja,
                    Chhattisgarh.


           Digitally
           signed by
           VEDPRAKASH
VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN
DEWANGAN   Date:
           2025.06.13
           19:06:00
           +0530
                                            2


4 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department Division Pathalgaon, District
Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

5 - Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Ambikapur, District Surguja,
Chhattisgarh.


                                                                   ... Respondent(s)

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate

For Respondents/State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate and Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Order on Board

12/06/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are

retired employees of the respondents' Departments and were working as

Work Charged Contingency paid employees. It is further submitted that in

light of judgment passed by this Court in WPS No. 3870 of 2021

(Faguvaram Patel and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others)

and other connected matters, decided on 30.09.2022, present petitioners

are also entitled for leave encashment.

2. Learned State counsel would submit that sufficient documents have not

been filed by the petitioners, and it is also not reflected as to whether the

petitioners have completed the minimum service to avail the benefit of

leave encashment.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on

record.

4. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed

representation before the concerned respondents/competent authority

within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order

with all necessary documents to substantiate their claim. In that event, on

due verification, if the petitioners are found to be similarly situated

persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra), their claim shall be

decided by the respondents in light of judgment passed in that case

expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of

submission of the said representation.

5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with aforesaid

observation and direction.

Sd/-

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter