Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1562 Chatt
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
SA No. 133 of 2006
Smt. Sukhia Bai & others Vs. Smt. Mehatarin Bai & others
SA No. 105 of 2006
24.03.2022 Mr. Ratan Pusty, counsel for the appellants.
Mr. Rajeev Bharat, counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that on the earlier round of litigation, the trial Court has passed judgment and decree in favour of the appellants. Against that order, the defendants have preferred first appeal before the learned District Judge, Raipur. The learned District Judge has remanded the matter with certain direction, but that direction has not been complied with. Thereafter, the judgment and decree has been passed against the present appellants and against that the appellants have preferred an appeal which was dismissed wherein, no specific direction for calling of the record has not been taken, but a general plea has been taken and that appeal has been dismissed without considering the earlier remand order, therefore, against that order, they have preferred the second appeal.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for two weeks time to argue the matter.
List this case after two weeks.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!