Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2169 Chatt
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 189 of 2011
Nand Kumar Versus Mayaram And Others
05.04.2022 Shri Manoj Kumar Dubey, counsel for the appellant.
Shri Somnath Verma, counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Shri Ravi Maheshwari, Panel Lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that learned trial Court has recorded the finding that though the present appellant is tribal still permission to sell is not required, on the other hand, learned counsel for the respondants No. 1 and 2 would submit that the provisions of Section 165 of the Land Revenue Code is not applicable in case of diverted land and Abadi Bhumi and would refer judgment of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in case of Mewalal vs Jankibai (1994 MPLJ 369).
The arguments heard in part. List the matter week after next.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE
Deshmukh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!