Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Jain vs Raj Kumar Saha & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 3217 Cal/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3217 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2023

Calcutta High Court

Sanjay Jain vs Raj Kumar Saha & Ors on 28 November, 2023

OD-13
                                ORDER SHEET

                               IA No. GA/9/2023
                                       In
                                 CS/331/2013

                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                               ORIGINAL SIDE

                               SANJAY JAIN
                                  -VS-
                          RAJ KUMAR SAHA & ORS.

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO
  Date : November 28, 2023.
                                                                     Appearance:
                                                     Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv.
                                                          Ms. Laila Khatun, Adv.
                                                                ...for the plaintiff

                                                       Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Adv.
                                                   Mr. Biswaroop Mukherjee, Adv.
                                                             Ms. Saheli Bose, Adv.
                                                    ...for the defendant nos. 1 to 3

                                                    Mr. Rittick Chowdhury, Adv.
                                                           Mr. S. K. Poddar, Adv.
                                                   ...for the defendant nos. 5 & 6.


        The Court: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, learned counsel, is appearing for

the plaintiff. Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, learned counsel, is appearing for the

defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Rittick Chowdhury, learned counsel, is

appearing for the defendant nos. 5 and 6.

        The defendant nos. 5 and 6 have filed an application being

GA/9/2023 praying for deletion/striking off their names from the suit or in

the alternative for rejection of the plaint.

        Counsel for the defendant nos. 5 and 6 submits that there is an

allegation against the defendant nos. 5 and 6 but the defendant nos. 5 and

6 are only the hall booking agents and nothing to do with the claim made
                                           2



by the plaintiff and as such, the defendant nos. 5 and 6 are not the

necessary parties in the suit and prays for deletion of their names from the

plaint.

          Counsel for the plaintiff has handed over a copy of the order passed

by this Court in GA/2865/2013 in CS/331/2013 wherein while disposing

of the said application, the Hon'ble Court has passed the following order :-


            "(23) In view of the aforesaid there will be an order of injunction
            restraining the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 from realizing money

on account of the film 'Black Mmail' from any of the other respondents or if already so realized, from using the same without keeping apart a of sum of Rs. 27,65,000/- upon intimation to the petitioner.

(24) As regards the D 5 cassettes for UFO and Quebe Digital and DG Beta Cassette for satellite and Beta cassette for local channel of the film 'Black Mmail', the same were to be handed over to the plaintiff in terms of the memorandum of agreement in terms of the clause 13 of the memorandum dated 10th January, 2013. Accordingly the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 are directed to hand over the aforesaid cassettes to the Advocates on record of the petitioner and the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 who will hold such cassettes as joint receivers without remuneration till the disposal of the suit. The order of injunction passed above will also continue till the disposal of the suit."

In view of the judgment passed by this Court dated 24th December,

2014 in GA/2865/2013, this Court is of the view that the balance of

convenience and inconvenience is in favour of the plaintiff and passed

injunction against all the defendants and as such, at this stage, it is not

proper for this Court to delete the names of the defendant nos. 5 and 6

from the plaint.

In view of the above, GA/9/2023 is disposed of.

Counsel for the defendant nos.5 and 6 prays for time to file written

statement.

Let written statement be filed within three weeks from date.

Let CS/331/2013 be listed on 20th December, 2023.

(KRISHNA RAO, J.)

sp3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter