Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4415 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2022
19.07.2022
Item No.29
Ct. No.35
Saswata
CRR 92 of 2019
with
CRAN 1 of 2019
(Old CRAN 149 of 2019)
Pradip Kumar Gupta
-vs-
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Sanat Kumar Das
Mr. Sujan Chatterjee
Mr. Satadru Lahiri
... for the petitioner
Mr. Swapan Banerjee
Ms. Purnima Ghosh
... for the State
Mr. Shubham Gupta
... for the OP no. 2
Mr. K.P.Tiwari
... for OP no. 3
In re : CRAN 1 of 2019
Learned advocates for the petitioner as well as opposite party
nos. 2 and 3 are present. Affidavit of service filed by learned advocate
for the petitioner is taken on record.
It appears that service in respect of opposite party members is
complete and notice of the same has been served upon the learned
Public Prosecutor, High Court at Calcutta.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that after filing
of the writ petition, the same was dismissed for default and it was
subsequently restored on 17.02.2020. It is further submitted that
there has been a delay of 69 days in filing the revisional application
which was initially stated as 155 days.
The petitioner clarified his position by filing supplementary
affidavit, copy of which has been served upon the learned advocate for
the opposite party nos. 2 and 3.
Considered the submission.
The petitioner has filed this revisional application under
Sections 401 and 482 of the Cr.P.C., assailing a judgment and order
dated 04.08.2018, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions
judge, Bench II, City Sessions Court , Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta in
Criminal Revision no. 62 of 2018 thereby affirming the order dated
15.12.2017
passed by the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Calcutta in connection with Jorabagan P.S. case no. 176
of 2016.
The revisional application was filed on 11.01.2019. It is
submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was a delay in
receiving the certified copy for which the revisional application could
not be filed in time. Considering the submission, it appears to me
that the delay has been well explained by the petitioner.
Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the application under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed and the revisional
application is admitted. CRAN No. 1 of 2019 is disposed of.
Let the matter be listed under the heading "contested
application" in the monthly list of August.
(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!