Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

NI Act, Section 141. Offences by companies


 
Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Criminal Laws Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
26 09.12.1881 17
Chapter Title Ministry Department
Of Penalties in Case of Dishonour of certain Cheques for insuffiency of Funds in the Accounts Ministry of Finance Department of Financial Services

(1) If the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and proceeded against and punished accordingly];

Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.

1[“Provided further that where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or State Government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter.]

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attribute to, any neglect on the part of, any director, Manager, secretary, or other office of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. Explanation: For the purpose of this section. –

(a) “Company” means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and

(b) “Director”, in relating to a firm, means a partner in the firm.

___________________

1. Ins. by Act 55 of 2002, s. 8, (w.e.f. 6-2-2003).

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on NI Act, Section 141. Offences by companies

Alka Khandu Avhad Vs. Amar Syamprasad Mishra, 2021 Latest Caselaw 128 SC P. Mohanraj Vs. M/s. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd., 2021 Latest Caselaw 109 SC HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, 2020 Latest Caselaw 595 SC SHAILENDRA SWARUP vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, 2020 Latest Caselaw 430 SC KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD vs. B. HEERA NAIK, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1153 SC Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra Vs. The State of Jharkhand [MARCH 23, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 203 SC Sharat Babu Digumarti Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi [December 14, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 906 SC Standard Chartered Bank Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others Etc. [April 06, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 270 SC Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh Vs. Vijay D. Salvi [July 06, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 441 SC Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [January 09, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 16 SC Gunmala Sales Private Ltd. Vs. Anu Mehta & Ors. [October 17, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 670 SC Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & ANR. [August 1, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 474 SC A.K. Singhania Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizerco. Ltd. & ANR. [OCTOBER 17, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 732 SC Ajoy Acharya Vs. State Bureau of Inv. against Eco. Offence [September 17, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 662 SC Harshendra Kumar D Vs Rebatilata Koley Etc., 2011 Latest Caselaw 101 SC M.A.A.Annamalai Vs. State of Karnataka & ANR. [2010] INSC 628 (12 August 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 570 SC M/S Eicher Tractors Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Harihar Singh & ANR. [2008] INSC 1895 (7 November 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 986 SC M/S Green Earth Asphalt & Power P.Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.P.S.O & Ors [2008] INSC 1359 (13 August 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 722 SC Aneeta Hada Vs. M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd. [2008] INSC 837 (8 May 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 470 SC Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Rajvir Industries Ltd. & Ors. [2008] INSC 34 (9 January 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 34 SC N. Rangachari Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd [2007] Insc 427 (19 April 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 355 SC Everest Advertising Pvt. Ltd Vs. State, Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors [2007] Insc 378 (10 April 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 306 SC Dilip S. Dahanukar Vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr [2007] Insc 377 (10 April 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 305 SC S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs. Neeta Bhalla & Anr [2007] Insc 174 (20 February 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 174 SC Saroj Kumar Poddar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr [2007] Insc 45 (16 January 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 45 SC S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Neeta Bhalla And Anr [2005] Insc 500 (20 September 2005), 2005 Latest Caselaw 499 SC State of Punjab Vs. Kasturi Lal & Ors [2004] Insc 415 (28 July 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 377 SC M/S. Bsi Ltd. & ANR Vs. Gift Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & ANR [2000] INSC 62 (15 February 2000), 2000 Latest Caselaw 62 SC Rajneesh Aggarwal Vs. Amit J. Bhalla [2000] INSC 5 (4 January 2000), 2000 Latest Caselaw 5 SC