Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Krishnamurthy S. Setlur (D) Through Lrs. v. O.V. Narasimha Setty (D) By Lrs.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 681 SC

Headnote :

The Limitation Act of 1963, Article 65, addresses adverse possession and the right to seek restoration. The appeals raise a preliminary question regarding whether the plaintiff can assert a claim of adverse possession based on the interpretation of Article 65. In the case of Ravinder Kaur Grewal & O...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Canara Bank

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 682 SC

Headnote :

Indu Malhotra, J.A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 7(4)(c) - Arbitration Agreement - The existence of an arbitration agreement is confirmed by the agreement between the parties as documented in a judicial order, which is deemed final and conclusive. MTNL, having consented to refer di...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Canara Bank

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 683 SC

Headnote :

Sections 16 and 7(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956.[Para ]
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Canara Bank

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 684 SC

Headnote :

Sections 16 and 7(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956.[Para ]
Baljeet Singh v. State of U.P.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 685 SC

Headnote :

Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.[Paragraph]
Commissioner of Police v. Devender Anand

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 686 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 420 and 34, along with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, addresses the issue of cheating through private criminal complaints and proceedings. In this case, after discovering that the property he purchased was mortgaged to a bank,...
Zonal Manager, Bank of India, Zonal Office, Kochi v. Aarya K. Babu

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 687 SC

Headnote :

Service Regulations for Officers of the Bank of India, established in 1979.[Paragraph]
Secretary Managing Committee BSMPG College Roorkee v. Dr. Samrat Sharma

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 689 SC

Headnote :

U.P. State Universities Act of 1973, Section 50, subsection (1).
State of Tamil Nadu v. A. Kalaimani

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 690 SC

Headnote :

Sections 465, 468, 471, 417, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with Section 66 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, in conjunction with Section 43 (1).[Para ]
M/s Shahi And Associates v. State of U.P.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 691 SC

Headnote :

Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976.
Krishnamurthy S. Setlur (D) Through Lrs. v. O.V. Narasimha Setty (D) By Lrs.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 692 SC

Headnote :

Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Commissioner of Police v. Devender Anand

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 693 SC

Headnote :

Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.[Paragraph]
Wainganga Bahuuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha Through President B.B. Karanjekar v. Ku. Jaya

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 694 SC

Headnote :

Maharashtra Universities Act of 1994, Section 59.
Anu Bhanvara v. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 695 SC

Headnote :

According to Sections 147 and 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the liability of the insurer to provide compensation arises when gratuitous passengers, who were traveling in a goods vehicle, suffer permanent disabilities due to injuries from an accident. Although the vehicle was insured as a good...
State of Andhra Pradesh v. B. Ranga Reddy

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 696 SC

Headnote :

A. According to the Civil Procedure Code of 1908, specifically Order 41, Rules 22 and 33, in the context of appeals and cross-objections, defendants are not permitted to appeal against a decree that simply dismisses a suit. They can, however, challenge any findings against them through cross-objecti...
Wainganga Bahuuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha Through President B.B. Karanjekar v. Ku. Jaya

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 697 SC

Headnote :

Termination - Sustainability - The respondent was appointed on an ad-hoc basis while awaiting the filling of a regular vacancy - No entitlement was granted to the respondent for a regular appointment - The respondent\'s appointment was not considered probationary as there was no such stipulation in...
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited v. Union of India
Director of Horticulture, Odisha v. Pravat Kumar Dash

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 701 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 311, and the Orissa Civil Services Rules, 1962.
Venkitalakshmi v. K. Raju

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 706 SC

Headnote :

According to Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the High Court determined that the Plaintiff did not demonstrate that the deadline for completing the transaction was extended. This finding is not erroneous. Once the notion that the tim...
Ashok Kumar v. Depinder Singh Dhesi

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 707 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(b), addresses noncompliance with court orders. It was determined that degrees obtained through Distance Education Mode were not legally valid. However, students who enrolled between 2001 and 2005 were granted two opportunities to demonstrate their qualific...
Assam Public Works v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 708 SC

Headnote :

The Citizenship Act of 1955, specifically Sections 3 and 6A, along with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules 2003, Rule 4A, pertains to the creation of the National Register of Indian Citizens in Assam. In its order dated July 23, 2019, the Court refe...
Nareshbhai Bhagubhai v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 709 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 20 of the Railways Act, 1989 and Section 20(D) of the Railways (Amendment) Act, 2008, regarding acquisition proceedings, it is noted that objections must be properly addressed. The oral communication of orders and notes made on internal files do not fulfill the legal requirements. T...
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/s. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 710 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 92 and 143(3), pertains to transfer pricing and additional assessments. The respondent received a certain amount of brokerage from its parent company. During the assessment proceedings, the respondent was instructed to provide details regarding the p...
Thankamony Amma v. Omana Amma N.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 711 SC

Headnote :

The Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act of 1965, Section 20, addresses the relationship between landlord and tenant. It clarifies that when the High Court is exercising its revisional powers, it is not permitted to reassess the evidence or the concurrent findings made by the lower courts....
Madhukar Nivrutti Jagtap v. Smt. Pramilabai Chandulal Parandekar

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 712 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the principle of lis pendens does not render transactions occurring during the pendency of a lawsuit illegal or void from the outset. Instead, the doctrine of lis pendens serves to ensure that such transactions are subordinate to the rights...
Thankamony Amma v. Omana Amma N.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 713 SC

Headnote :

Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963.[Paragraph]
Venkitalakshmi v. K. Raju

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 714 SC

Headnote :

Article 136(1) of the Constitution of India, 1950.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Laxman Das Khandelwal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 715 SC

Headnote :

According to Sections 132 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a reassessment can be challenged on the basis that the Assessing Officer did not have jurisdiction due to the absence of a Notice. If the Assessing Officer, in rejecting a return filed under Section 158 BC(a), conducts an inquiry, he...
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/s. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 716 SC

Headnote :

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.[Paragraph]
Assam Public Works v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 718 SC

Headnote :

The Citizenship Act of 1955, Section 3 (1)(a), along with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, specifically Rule 4A.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Laxman Das Khandelwal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 719 SC

Headnote :

According to Sections 132 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a reassessment can be challenged on the basis that the Assessing Officer did not have jurisdiction due to the absence of a Notice. If the Assessing Officer, in rejecting a return filed under Section 158 BC(a), conducts an inquiry, he...
Kum C. Yamini v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 721 SC

Headnote :

According to Rule 9 of the A.P. State Judicial Service Rules, 2007, seniority is determined from the date of initial appointment as an ad hoc District Judge. It was determined that the claim for seniority is influenced by various factors, including the nature of the appointment, the rules governing...
Vinod Singh Negi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 722 SC

Headnote :

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302 and 34 - Murder - Bail pending appeals - The High Court did not provide justification for granting bail - The complainant and the State have submitted new evidence against the accused for the first time in the appeals, revealing the criminal history of the accuse...
Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner EPFO, Bareilly v. M/s U.P. State Warehousing Corp.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 723 SC

Headnote :

The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 1952, specifically Sections 2F and 7A, addresses the determination of funds owed by employers. The question arises whether workers engaged in loading and unloading activities in warehouses are entitled to benefits under this Act. If t...
State of Rajasthan v. Shiv Dayal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 724 SC

Headnote :

Mining Operations - Permanent Injunction against the State - Dismissal of the second appeal due to the absence of a substantial question of law in the appeals - It was determined that if one or more grounds are established in a suitable case based on the pleadings and evidence, such grounds will qua...
State of Jharkhand v. Gopal Prasad Mandal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 725 SC

Headnote :

Appeal - Road construction - Contempt petition - Dismissal of objections - The purpose of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was to guarantee the timely construction of the associated road, which has been completed, albeit at a different location due to an agreement among the villagers. The road w...
Udiya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 726 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, pertains to the murder of a brother in a case involving a sudden altercation between two siblings. During the struggle, the accused picked up a stone and struck the deceased. According to the eyewitness, the deceased\'s wife, she arrived at their home and re...
Joginder Singh v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 728 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding death in an accident, the multiplier for calculating compensation must be based on the age of the deceased. In this case, the deceased was 20 years old, so a multiplier of 18 is applicable instead of 11.[Para 4]B. In accordance with Sec...
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Kanshi Ram

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 729 SC

Headnote :

The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 pertains to the acquisition of land for road construction. The court ruled that the compensation and interest on the total compensation should not be based on the market value due to a lack of documentary evidence. Additionally, the State alleged that a sale deed fro...
Kanwaljit Singh v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 730 SC

Headnote :

Family Mediclaim Policy - Entitlement to 50% of the sum insured under an individual Mediclaim Policy - During the term of the Family Mediclaim Policy, the appellant\'s son became ill and required treatment at the Post Graduate Institute. It was determined that the total medical expenses or claims fo...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter