Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of august 2019

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

KHUMAN SINGH vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 781 SC

CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
Gwalior
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

A. According to Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, an offense must be committed against an individual solely because they belong to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. In this case, there is no evidence indicating that the offense...

Read full Judgement

BALAJI ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS PARTNERS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 782 SC

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

Headnote :

The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act of 1966, Section 127, addresses the reservation of land and its potential lapse. According to the final development plan for the city, the appellant\'s land was designated for a shopping center and a garden. The law requires that if the landowner wishes...

Read full Judgement

JAYESH H.PANDYA vs. SUBHTEX INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 783 SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 11, addresses the waiver of the right to extend the time for completing arbitration proceedings and issuing an award beyond the designated four-month period by the arbitrator. The arbitration petition was dismissed, affirming that the timeline es...

Read full Judgement

CHENNADI JALAPATHI REDDY vs. BADDAM PRATAPA REDDY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 784 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Limitation Act, 1963
Specific Relief Act, 1963

Alamgir Vs. State [2002] INSC467 (12 November 2002)

Headnote :

A. Under the Evidence Act of 1872, specifically Sections 46 and 47, and the Specific Relief Act of 1963, Section 20, a case for specific performance was brought forth by the plaintiff regarding an agreement to sell. During the trial, the document was sent for expert analysis to determine the authent...

Read full Judgement

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU vs. G. HEMALATHAA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 785 SC

Constitution of India

Umesh Chandra Shukla Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 167 (2 August 1985)

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Position of Civil Judge - Use of pencil on answer sheets - Selection - The respondent highlighted certain sections of the answer sheet with pencil, which contravenes the Commission\'s mandatory instructions - The respondent\'s selection is annulled.[Par...

Read full Judgement

RABINDRA KUMAR SHAW vs. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 786 SC

Army Act, 1950

Headnote :

According to Section 41 of the Army Act, 1950, charges of disobedience can lead to termination of service. Personnel in the Armed Forces are distinct from those in civil services. Failing to report to one\'s assigned unit and disobeying lawful orders is a serious matter that cannot be overlooked. Th...

Read full Judgement

DR. PROFESSOR RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 787 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

A. According to Section 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994, and Rule 6 of the Uttar Pradesh Medical Colleges Teachers Service (Second Amendment) Rules 2005, the appointment of Professors is subject to reserv...

Read full Judgement

KOTTANGADA B.MOTAIAH vs. MACHIMADA BELLIAPPA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 788 SC

Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964

Headnote :

A. According to Section 79(2) of the Coorg Land and Revenue Regulation, 1899, \"Bane\" land refers to areas defined in the Coorg Revenue Manual of 1954 as lands that are adjacent to private properties. These lands are allocated to the owners of the adjacent private lands without any revenue charge,...

Read full Judgement

M/S N RAMACHANDRA REDDY vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 789 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950 Article 14 - Decision-making process regarding tenders: The appellant was awarded a contract for the construction of a BT Road. According to the tender requirements, bidders were required to have a Batch Type Hot Mix Plant located within 100 km of the last point of th...

Read full Judgement

PRAHLAD RAUT vs. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 790 SC

Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Constitution of India
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 379. Punishment for theft
Limitation Act, 1963

Headnote :

Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985, Section 21; Indian Penal Code of 1860, Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 477A, and 120B; Central Civil Services Classification, Control and Appeal Rules of 1965, Rule 10(2).[Para ]

Read full Judgement

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JODHPUR vs. NEETU HARSH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 791 SC

Constitution of India
Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010

Mohan & Ors Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [1998] INSC 296 (12 May 1998)
Mohan & Ors Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [1998] INSC 301 (12 May 1998)

Headnote :

A. According to the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, specifically Sections 18 and 36, and the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010, Rule 10(4), there is a provision for reserving positions for individuals with disabilities in t...

Read full Judgement

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS vs. LORD NOTHBOOK AND ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 792 SC

Constitution of India
Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Indian Succession Act, 1925

State of Punjab Vs. Balwant Singh & Ors [1991] INSC 258 (9 October 1991)
State of Bihar Vs. Radha Krishna Singh & Ors [1983] INSC 45 (20 April 1983)

Headnote :

A. Under the Rajasthan Escheats Regulation Act, 1956, specifically Sections 4, 6, and 7, along with Section 29 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the doctrine of escheats applies under certain conditions. When an individual dies intestate and leaves no qualified heirs to inherit their property, that...

Read full Judgement

SYED ZAINUL ABEDEEN vs. RAJASTHAN BOARD OF MUSLIM WAQF.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 793 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

A. Under the Wakf Act of 1954, specifically Sections 5(2) and 6, a suit aimed at declaring a property as Wakf Alal Aulad is subject to a limitation period. According to Section 5(2), no suit can be filed after one year from the date the list of wakfs is published under that subsection. In this case,...

Read full Judgement

VINIT GARG vs. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION,

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 794 SC

Constitution of India
Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985
University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Headnote :

The University Grants Commission Act of 1956, Section 22, and the All India Council for Technical Education Act of 1987, Sections 10 and 11, address the validity of B.Tech. degrees obtained through distance learning. The petitioners requested that the UGC clarify that their B.Tech. degrees, earned v...

Read full Judgement

VITHALDAS JAGANNATH KHATRI (D) THROUGH SMT. SHAKUNTALA ALIAS SUSHMI vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 795 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
Hindu Succession (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1986
Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966
Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955
Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955
Section 123. TPA, Transfer how effected.
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Namburi Basava Subrahmanyam Vs. Alapati Hymavathi & Ors [1996] INSC 480 (2 April 1996)
Mancheri Puthusseri Ahmed & Ors Vs. Kuthiravattam Estate Receiver [1996] INSC 1112 (11 September 1996)
State of Maharashtra Vs. Narayan Rao Sham Rao Deshmukh & Ors [1985] INSC 62 (19 March 1985)
Gurdit Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Ors [1974] INSC 90 (10 April 1974)
State of West Bengal Vs. Union of India [1962]382 (21 December 1962)

Headnote :

Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act of 1961 - Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act of 1955 - Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956.

Read full Judgement

«
1
2
3
4
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs