Sunday, 26, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

MUKESH vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2020 Latest Caselaw 294 SC

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 294 SC
Judgement Date : 19 Mar 2020
Case No : W.P.(Crl.) No.-000119 / 2020

    
   SC Pdf Link
Headnote :

Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - Conviction - The petitioner argued that the evidence was not properly considered. However, the petitioner was given ample opportunity, and after reviewing the evidence, the conviction was confirmed by the High Court on appeal. The criminal appeal presented to the Supreme Court was thoroughly examined, and the arguments put forth by the accused were taken into account and subsequently rejected. Therefore, there are no valid grounds to proceed with the writ petition. The petition is dismissed.



[Para 5]

 

Before :- R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and A.S. Bopanna, JJ.

Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) Nos.119 of 2020. D/d. 19.3.2020.

Mukesh - Petitioners

Versus

State of NCT of Delhi - Respondents

For the Petitioners :- Manohar Lal Sharma, Ms. Suman, Deepak Goel, Advocates.

For the Respondents :- Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate.

ORDER

We have heard Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Mukesh- the convict.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has raised the points on merits of the matter:- (i) That there was no proper consideration of evidence; (ii) regarding the disability of Ram Singh (accused no.1) who subsequently allegedly committed suicide in the prison; and (iii) raising doubts about the arrest of the petitioner at Karoli, Rajasthan and inter alia on other points.

3. The petitioner was afforded sufficient opportunity and after consideration of the evidence, the petitioner has been convicted which was upheld in appeal by the High Court, by the judgment dated 13.03.2014. The criminal appeal filed before this Court was heard at length and the points raised by the accused herein were considered in Crl.Appeal Nos. 607-608 of 2017 - Mukesh & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. and were dismissed by the judgment of this Court dated 05.05.2017. Subsequently, Review Petition (Crl.) No.570 of 2017 filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed by the judgment of this Court on 09.07.2018. Curative petition(R) No.6 of 2020 filed by the petitioner was also dismissed by this Court on 14.01.2020. Mercy Petition of Mukesh was also rejected by His Excellency the President of India on 17.01.2020. The writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the Order of rejection of Mercy Petition was also dismissed by this Court on 29.01.2020.

4. The petitioner has filed the criminal revision petition before the Patiala House Courts which came to be dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi dated 17.03.2020. Criminal Revision Petition NO.237 of 2020 filed by the petitioner-Mukesh challenging the said Order dated 17.03.2020 was also dismissed by the High Court on 18.03.2020.

5. In view of above and also considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any ground to entertain this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

6. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter