Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Shankar Prahlad Deshpande & Ors Vs. Seth Gendalal Motilal Patni & Ors [1969] INSC 316 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 316 SC

Headnote :

A mortgagor submitted an application to the Claims Officer under section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals and Alienated Lands) Act 1 of 1951, seeking a determination of the debt owed to the mortgagee and a reduction of that debt. The mortgagee argued that the...
Narayanibai Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1969] INSC 317 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 317 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner was required to explain why the land she held beyond the ceiling limit should not be classified as surplus land and consequently transferred to the State under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceilings on Holdings) Act, 1961. In response, the petitioner contested the constitutional...
Coffee Board, Bangalore Vs. Joint Commercial Tax Officer, Madras & ANR [1969] INSC 318 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 318 SC

Headnote :

According to Article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution, sales tax exemptions are provided for the sale or purchase of goods that occur during the importation into or exportation out of India.Following the 6th Amendment to the Constitution, Parliament enacted the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which specif...
Choudhry Jawaharlal & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1969] INSC 319 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 319 SC

Headnote :

The appellants built several public structures in a princely state, and the Maharaja acknowledged their claim by signing a promissory note for the claimed amount. Following the merger of the princely state with Madhya Pradesh, the State Government (respondent) assumed control of the public buildings...
State of Haryana Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 320 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 320 SC

Headnote :

In August 1954, the Rohtak Municipal Committee was dissolved, and an Administrator was appointed in accordance with section 238 of the Punjab Municipal Act of 1911. By June 1958, the provisions of the Punjab Town Improvement Act of 1922 were applied to the Municipality, leading to the establishment...
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Satya Narain Prasad [1969] INSC 321 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 321 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was awarded a lease for a public ferry by the State of Uttar Pradesh for a duration of three years.According to section 10 of the Northern India Ferries Act, 1878, the State Government had the authority to terminate such a lease after providing six months\' written notice to the lesse...
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Satya Narain Prasad [1969] INSC 321 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 322 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was awarded a lease for a public ferry by the State of Uttar Pradesh for a duration of three years.According to section 10 of the Northern India Ferries Act, 1878, the State Government had the authority to terminate such a lease after providing six months\' written notice to the lesse...
Jai Chand Sawhney Vs. Union of India [1969] INSC 322 (31 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 323 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who worked for the railway, was terminated from his position on October 13, 1949. On October 13, 1955, he initiated a lawsuit against the respondent to overturn the dismissal order and to claim unpaid salary. The dismissal was annulled due to the failure to provide the constitutional...
Kidar Nath Vs. Mangat Rai & Ors [1969] INSC 323 (31 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 324 SC

Headnote :

In a case concerning the redemption of a mortgage with possession under a mortgage deed from 1896, the Court determined the outstanding amount owed on the mortgages. The mortgagor did not make any payments as ordered by the decree. Following his death, his representatives sought relief under section...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter