Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kanti Lal Damor vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 12390 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12390 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Kanti Lal Damor vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 28 April, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:20507]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8551/2025

1.       Kanti Lal Damor S/o Kalu Ram Damor, Aged About 51
         Years, R/o Village And Post Sareadi Bheelan, Suwala,
         Dist. Banswara. (Raj.).
2.       Parmi Katara W/o Anil Kumar Katara, Aged About 45
         Years, R/o Village And Post Bhuri Sair, Dist. Banswara.
         (Raj.).
3.       Lal Singh Bamaniya S/o Rajengh Bamaniya, Aged About
         55 Years, R/o Village And Post Ward No. 03, Garadiya,
         Dist. Banswara. (Raj.).
4.       Sunita Damor W/o Aliya Maida, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
         Village And Post Bujabara, Talwara, Dist. Banswara.
         (Raj.)..
5.       Sarojani Garasiya W/o Pradeep Garasiya, Aged About 49
         Years, R/o Village And Post Sevaniya, Mahuri, Dist.
         Banswara. (Raj.).
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.       The    State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through        The    Secretary,
         Department Of Rural And Panchayati Raj, Government Of
         Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.       The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of
         Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.       The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4.       The    Director,       Secondary        Education,         Bikaner,   District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5.       District     Education         Officer       (Elementary         Education),
         Chittorgarh.
6.       District     Education         Officer        (Secondary         Education),
         Chittorgarh.
7.       District     Education         Officer       (Elementary         Education),
         Banswara.
8.       District     Education         Officer        (Secondary         Education),
         Banswara.
9.       District     Education         Officer       (Elementary         Education),
         Udaipur.

                        (Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:05:53 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:20507]                       (2 of 3)                         [CW-8551/2025]


10.      District Education Officer (Secondary Education), Udaipur.
                                                                     ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Bherulal Jat.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

28/04/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment rendered by this court at Jaipur Bench in the case of

Om Prakash & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: (S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.21214/2017) decided on 21.11.2017 granting

relief to the petitioners in light of judgment in the case of

Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015, decided on 1.4.2015 and

relying upon the adjudication in the case of Suman Bai & Anr. v.

State of Rajasthan & Ors.: 2009 (1) WLC (Raj.) 381 and,

therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in light of

judgment in the case of Om Prakash (supra).

2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be

permitted to file a detailed representation before the competent

authorities for redressal of their grievances.

3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of

with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation to the

competent authorities of the department and the competent

authorities of the department are directed to decide the same

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such

[2025:RJ-JD:20507] (3 of 3) [CW-8551/2025]

representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court in

the case of Om Prakash (supra).

4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 307-Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter