Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1474 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:10994]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3169/2024
1. Narayan Chandra Mathur S/o Pratap Chandra Mathur,
Aged About 62 Years, R/o 7/440, Sector No. 7, Malviya
Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Om Prakash Sharma S/o Ganpat Lal Sharma, Aged About
64 Years, R/o B-15, J.D.A. Staff Colony, Jagatpura, Tila
Wala N R I Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Laxman Singh Bana S/o Ladu Ram, Aged About 64 Years,
R/o 121-A, Himmat Nagar, Tonk Road, Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
4. Virendra Singh Sunda S/o Laxman Singh, Aged About 63
Years, R/o 28, Jai Jawan Colony-2, Tonk Road, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Ram Phool Meena S/o Onkar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o
Tongya Ki Dhani, Ramsinghpura, Bassi, Kanota, District
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Mohummed Moinuddin Khan S/o Late A.R. Khan, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o Sector 66, Mansarovar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
7. Ved Prakash Gupta S/o Mangti Lal, Aged About 63 Years,
R/o 101/92, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
8. Bhagwan Das Subnani S/o C.M. Subnani, Aged About 61
Years, R/o 883, Siddharth Nagar-A Block, Near Jain
Temple, Opposite Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
9. Nand Kishor Singhal S/o Devi Shankar Singhal, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o D-192, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
10. Ashutosh Goswami S/o D.D. Goswami, Aged About 62
Years, R/o J-44, Krishana Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
11. Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/o Rameshwar Lal Sharma, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o 3407, Jai Lal Munshi Ka Rasta, Purani
Basti, Chandpol Bazar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
12. Jageshwar Lodhi S/o Baijnath Lodhi, Aged About 68
Years, R/o B-72, Khushar Yojana JDA, Ramchandrapura,
Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
13. Mahendra Kumar Sharma S/o Chothmal Sharma, Aged
(Downloaded on 05/03/2024 at 08:48:23 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:10994] (2 of 6) [CW-3169/2024]
About 63 Years, R/o 5 T 6, Housing Board, Shastri Nagar,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
14. Surgyan Jat S/o Parta Ram Jat, Aged About 63 Years, R/o
297, Shiv Nagar-I, VKI Road No. 1, Murlipura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
15. Pramod Kumar Vyas S/o Kishan Lal Vyas, Aged About 60
Years, R/o 65, Vivek Vihar, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
16. Ghan Shyam Khatik S/o Bhori Lal Khatik, Aged About 63
Years, R/o Chandlai, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
17. Ram Sagar Meena S/o Keshri Lal Meena, Aged About 69
Years, R/o 17-A, Prem Nagar 2nd, Model Town, Jagatpura
Road, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
18. Govind Prasad Goyal S/o R.S. Goyal, Aged About 61
Years, R/o 144, Gandhi Path, Queens Road, Behind Bharat
Apartment, Vidhyut Nagar-C, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
19. Pawan Kumar Taletia S/o Heera Lal Taletia, Aged About 67
Years, R/o 10/167, Malviya Nagar, Jain Mandir Ke Samne,
Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
20. Suresh Chand Sharma S/o Bhorilal Sharma, Aged About
60 Years, R/o 110, 111, Hasanpura C, N.B.C. Road,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
21. Prem Shankar S/o Badri Lal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o
93, Surya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
22. Raghunath Prasad Sharma S/o Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged
About 60 Years, R/o Village Bimalpura (Choudhary Ki
Dhani), Post Kandrapura, Vaya Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu,
District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
23. Govind Kant Sharma S/o Banshi Dhar Sharma, Aged
About 69 Years, R/o 32-C, Prem Colony, Surya Nagar,
Taron Ki Kunt, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
24. Santosh Kumar Sharma S/o Birdhi Chand, Aged About 70
Years, R/o B-56, Sanjay Colony, Nehru Nagar, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
25. Vimal Kumar Sharma S/o Nand Kishor Sharma, Aged
About 66 Years, R/o Raghunath Ji Ka Mohalla, Dausa,
Rajasthan.
26. Sheraram Kalwal S/o Cholaram Kalwal, Aged About 71
(Downloaded on 05/03/2024 at 08:48:23 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:10994] (3 of 6) [CW-3169/2024]
Years, R/o D-327, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
27. Bhagwan Datt Sharma S/o Ram Nivash Sharma, Aged
About 60 Years, R/o 152/64-A, Shipra Path, Mansarovar,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
28. Vinod Kumar Godha S/o Late Vimal Chand Jain, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o 271, Sachivalya Vihar, Ricco Katta
Choraha, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
29. Vimla Devi W/o Durga Prasad, Aged About 64 Years, R/o
A-31, Malviya Nagar A-Block, Ward No. 26, Malviya Nagar,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
30. Ramesh Chand Choudhary S/o Chittar Singh Choudhary,
Aged About 72 Years, R/o 11, Adarsh Krishna Nagar,
Kartarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
31. Bhanwar Lal Jat S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 64 Years, R/o
Bagru Khurd, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
32. Syed Iqbal S/o Syed Nawab Ali, Aged About 70 Years, R/o
4200, Jagannath Shah Ka Rasta, Chokdi Ramchandra Ji
Ki, Ramgang Bazar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
33. Sharad Krishan Bhatt S/o B.k. Bhatt, Aged About 64
Years, R/o 41-A, Mohan Marg, Nirman Nagar, Kasturba
Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
34. Yogendra Kumar Sharma S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, Aged
About 69 Years, R/o C-28, Tonk Road, Purani Sabji Mandi
Ke Samne, J.D.A. Flats, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
35. Radha Mohan S/o Narayan, Aged About 68 Years, R/o 11,
Sanghiji Ka Bada, Jain Mandir, Jain Mohalla, Sanganer,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
36. Satya Narain Sharma (Since Deceased) S/o Anandi Lal
Sharma, Through His Wife Smt. Bimla Sharma W/o Late
Satya Narain Sharma, Aged About 71 Years, R/o A-593,
Govind Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Urban Development And Housing Department,
Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Jaipur Development Authority, Through The Secretary,
J.LN. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
(Downloaded on 05/03/2024 at 08:48:23 PM)
[2024:RJ-JP:10994] (4 of 6) [CW-3169/2024]
3. The Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, J.L.N.
Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
4. Assistant Accounts Officer (Pension), Jaipur Development
Authority, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajit Kaswa
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh for
Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
04/03/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the issue
involved in the present matter is no more res integra in view of
judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh
Chander Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 2800/2021; decided on 17.10.2023). It is
further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances, the
order of the Division Bench has also been followed by Co-ordinate
Bench in the case of Ramesh Chand vs. State of Rajasthan &
Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19121/2023; decided on
07.12.2023).
2. Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute the fact
that the issue, as raised in the present writ petition, is similar to
Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). However, it is contended that
the petitioners have approached the Court at a belated stage.
3. Heard.
4. The fact that the issue involved is covered by Division Bench
of this Court in case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra)
[2024:RJ-JP:10994] (5 of 6) [CW-3169/2024]
remains undisputed. The contention that the petitioners have
approached the Court with a little delay is of no relevancy in the
facts and circumstances as matters of salary and pension have a
recurring cause of action, as was held by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Rushibhai Jagdishbhai Pathak vs. Bhavnagar
Municipal Corporation: 2022 (4) SLR 862 (SC).
5. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division
Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in
Union of India & Ors. vs. Manohar Lal & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.5445/2022; decided on 07.08.2023) & the
Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. vs.
Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.4139/2022) as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court
in the case of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. vs.
C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC OnlineSC 401 has
passed the following directions:-
"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No.3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No.1001/2023 have also been dis- posed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass ap- propriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are dis-posed of."
6. In light of the subsequent developments and the change in
legal position, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file a detailed
representation before the concerned authority within a period of
10 days, which shall be adjudicated upon by the said authority
[2024:RJ-JP:10994] (6 of 6) [CW-3169/2024]
within a further period of 60 days, after having effectuated
compliance with the principles of natural justice and also, the law
applicable.
7. In light of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GARIMA /11
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!