Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1171 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.764 of 2021
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7165 of 2019
======================================================
Vasudeo Mahto, Son of Ramjee Mahto 144 Tikia Toli, P.O. Mahendru, P.S.
Sultanganj, District Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through Sri B. Kartikey Dhanjee, Excise Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Mr. Prahav Kumar The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur having his office at
Collectorate compound, Muzaffarpur.
3. Mr/Mrs. Harpreet Kaur The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, District-
Muzaffarpur.
4. Sri Bharti Rao Managing Director, Cholamandalam Investment and Finance
Company Ltd., Dare House-2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai- 600001.
5. Mr. V. Suryanarayan The Managing Director, Cholamandalam M/s General
Insurance Company Ltd., Dare House-2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys,
Chennai- 600001.
6. Mr. Kumar Anand the Area Receivable Manager, Hard Bucket (VF),
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., 201, Grands Yunus
Corporate beside Sukriti Tower, Near Surbhi Dhaba, S.P. Verma, P.S.-
Kotwari, District- Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikas Mohan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vivek Prasad (Gp 7)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 06-08-2025
The present M.J.C. / Contempt petition has been
filed for non-compliance of order dated 16.05.2019 passed in
C.W.J.C. No. 7165 of 2019.
2. State - Respondents have complied whatever the Patna High Court MJC No.764 of 2021 dt.06-08-2025
direction given by the Co-ordinate Bench. Grievance of the
petitioner is that Respondents No. 4 to 6 have not complied.
Perusal of the co-ordinate Bench decision dated 16.05.2019
passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7165 of 2019, it is evident that there is
no specific direction to Respondents No. 4 to 6 so as to summon
those Respondents and to try this Contempt of Court
proceedings.
3. In the absence of any specific direction to
Respondents No. 4 to 6, the present Contempt Petition is not
maintainable against aforementioned Respondents.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( S. B. Pd. Singh, J)
manish/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08.08.2025 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!