Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4062 Patna
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10877 of 2022
======================================================
1. Kamla Devi, Wife of Ramjeet Saw, resident of Village- Maudahi, P.O. -
Katesar, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna.
2. Jay Krishna Prasad, Ray son of Late Shri Prasad Ray, resident of Village -
Sikandarpur, P.O. - Katesar, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Patna Collectorate, Patna.
3. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna Collectorate, Patna.
4. The Additional District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna Collectorate, Patna.
5. Most. Kalawati Devi wife of Late Mahendra Singh @ Late Mahendra Mahto, resident of Village - Sikandarpur, P.O. - Katesar, P.S. - Bihta, District
- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rashid Izhar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan ( SC 25 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 25-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
counsel for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for directing
the respondent authorities to comply with the order dated
02.03.2020 passed in Land Acquisition Reference Case No.
311/2016(P) (arising out of L. A. Case No.01/2011-12) passed
by the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement
Authority, Patna and pay the awarded compensation amount to
the petitioners.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10877 of 2022 dt.25-08-2023
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority,
Patna has decided the Land Acquisition Reference Case No.
311/2016(P) (arising out of L. A. Case No.01/2011-12) in their
favour vide order dated 02.03.2020, but payment has not been
made to the petitioners by the District Land Acquisition Officer.
The petitioner has filed a representation to that effect before the
District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna, as contained in
Annexure-2 to the writ petition, but till date no action has been
taken on the representation of the petitioners. Therefore, they
have preferred the writ petition.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that from the
order, it transpires that one Mostt. Kalawati Devi who is
respondent No.5 in the present case had contested the Land
Acquisition Reference Case No. 311/2016(P) (arising out of L.
A. Case No.01/2011-12).
5. In this background, respondent No.3, namely, the
District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna is directed to take a
decision on the representation of the petitioner (Annexure-2 to
the writ petition) within three months from today considering
this aspect that Land Acquisition Reference Case No.
311/2016(P) has been decided in favour of the petitioners and Patna High Court CWJC No.10877 of 2022 dt.25-08-2023
also if Mostt. Kalawati Devi has not preferred any appeal under
Section 74 of the Right To Fair Compensation and Transparency
in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013
and there is a stay in her favour. The time frame of the
representation (Annexure-2) shall be counted from the date of
production/receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the
writ petition stands disposed of.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.08.2023 Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!