Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Binay Prasad Shahi @ Binay Kumar ... vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 1360 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1360 Patna
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Binay Prasad Shahi @ Binay Kumar ... vs The State Of Bihar on 24 February, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13772 of 2021
     ======================================================

Binay Prasad Shahi @ Binay Kumar Shahi S/o-Late Baidhyanath Shahi, Resi- dent of Village-Chanayanban, P.S.-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secreary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar.

4. The Development Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, District-

Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

7. The Zila Parishad, West Champaran, Bettiah through Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran.

8. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran

9. The Deputy Director, Panchayat Raj, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, District-

Muzaffarpur.

10. The Acting Chairman-Cum-Vice Chairman, Zila Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran

11. Ramdeshwar Singh S/o-Late Jagdevan Singh Resident of Village-Gawen-

dari, P.S.-Chainpur, District-East Champaran, Motihari, at Present Working as Accountant Head Clerk, Zila Parishad, West Champaran, Bettiah.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Pd. Gupta (GP-10) Mr. Anwar Karim (AC to GP-10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-02-2022

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the Patna High Court CWJC No.13772 of 2021 dt.24-02-2022

following relief/reliefs:

"(i) For issuance of an appro-

priate writ in quashing the Memo No.

134 dated 29.05.2021 issued under the

signature of D.D.C.-cum-Chief

Executive Officer, Zila Parishad,

West Champaran, Bettiah on the

order of the then Chairman, Zila

Parishad, West Chamapran, Bettiah

appointed the Respondent No.11 on

contract for the period of Eleven (11)

months with retrospective

effect contained in Annexure-2.

(ii) For issuance of an

appropriate writ in quashing the

signature of DDC-cum-Chief

Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, West

Chmaparan, Bettiah whereby on the

order of Acting Chairman-cum-Vice

Chairman, Zila Parishad West

Champaran, Bettiah, the respondent

no.11 has been directed to take charge Patna High Court CWJC No.13772 of 2021 dt.24-02-2022

of Accountant-cum-Head Clerk

from one Shambhu Kunwar

in-charge Accountant cum Head Clerk

of Zila Parishad Office and District

Engineer Office contained in

Annexure-3.

(iii) For issuance of an appro-

priate writ commanding the

Respondents to cancel the appointment

of Respondent No.11 with an

order of recovery of salary paid to him

after the appointment in terms of

Annexure-2 and 3 and further

commanding the respondents to

initiate disciplinary action against the

Deputy Development Commissioner-

cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila

Parishad, West Champaran, Bettiah

and enquiry against the Acting

Chairman-cum-Vice Chairman, Zila

Parishad, West Chamaparan,

Bettiah."

Patna High Court CWJC No.13772 of 2021 dt.24-02-2022

Petitioner has questioned the validity of

re-appointment of respondent no.11 on contract basis for a

period of 11 months pursuant to the order dated 29.05.2021. The

relief column do not reveal in respect of writ of quo warranto,

despite these facts, it is noticed that respondent no.11 was not

appointed to any particular post, thereafter, he was asked to

takeover the charge of head clerk/accountant. Further,

respondent no.11 is stated to have resigned the post which was

held by him. Accordingly, writ petition do not survive for

consideration.

Hence, writ petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Ankit/-

AFR/NAFR                         NAFR
CAV DATE                          NA
Uploading Date                02.03.2022
Transmission Date                 NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter