Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Empee Distilleries Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 8950 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8950 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2025

Madras High Court

Empee Distilleries Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 26 November, 2025

                                                                            T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 26.11.2025

                                                             CORAM :

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,
                                                   CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                       AND
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN

                                            T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025
                                      and C.M.P.Nos.23608, 23615 and 23644 of 2025

                     Empee Distilleries Limited
                     Rep. by its Authorised Signatory
                     Alfred Sagaya Sunder Xavier
                     No.72, Greams Road, Thousand Lights,
                     Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006

                                                                                           Appellant
                                                                                           in all appeals

                                                                  Vs

                     The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
                     Company Range II, Chennai
                     presently Corporate Circle 2(1),
                     Chennai 600 034

                                                                                           Respondent
                                                                                           in all appeals


                     PRAYER in TCA No.187 of 2025: Prayer: Appeal filed under Section
                     260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax
                     Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 16.06.2025 in
                     M.A.No.13/Chny/2023 in I.T.A.No.2334/Chny/2017.


                     ______________
                     Page 1 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm )
                                                                                  T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025



                     PRAYER in TCA No.188 of 2025: Prayer: Appeal filed under Section
                     260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax
                     Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 16.06.2025 in
                     M.A.No.14/Chny/2023 in I.T.A.No.2335/Chny/2017.

                     PRAYER in TCA No.189 of 2025: Prayer: Appeal filed under Section
                     260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax
                     Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai, dated 16.06.2025 in
                     M.A.No.15/Chny/2023 in I.T.A.No.2336/Chny/2017.

                                  For Appellant:                  Mr.Karthik Lakshmanan
                                                                  Arunachalam


                                  For Respondent:                 Mr.T.Ravi Kumar
                                                                  Senior Standing Counsel


                                                     COMMON JUDGMENT

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Heard.

2. These appeals were admitted on the following substantial

questions of law:

(1) Whether the Tribunal was conferred with jurisdiction to decide the appeal filed by the erstwhile management on 16.9.2017 (prior to CIRP) upon approval of Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority (AA) i.e., National Company Law Tribunal

______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

(NCLT) on 20.01.2020 in the case of the appellant company?

(2) Whether the order impugned in the appeal before the Tribunal i.e., the order of the CIT(A) dated 28.07.2017 and the original assessment order dated 31.12.2010 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) which was subject matter of challenge in the appeal pending before the CIT (A) would survive upon a Resolution Plan being approved by the AA on 20.01.2020?

(3) Whether the jurisdiction and powers conferred on the Tribunal ceases upon approval of a Resolution Plan by the AA against one of the parties?

(4) Whether pending proceedings and/or demands subject matter of such pending proceedings before the Tribunal relating to the period prior to the approval of the Resolution Plan by the AA not being part of the Resolution Plan approved by the AA would survive or would stand extinguished upon approval of the Resolution Plan by the AA?

(5) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in refusing to exercise its jurisdiction under Section

______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 even though preparation of the Resolution Plan under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) was brought to its notice?

3. On the date when the appeals were admitted by this Court, it

was brought to the notice of this Court that, in view of the

authoritative pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case

of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited, through the

Authorised Signatory v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company

Limited, through the Director and others1, upon approval of the

resolution plan, the claim, if any, of recovery of any tax from the

appellant stands extinguished and this aspect was not taken into

consideration by the Tribunal even when application seeking

rectification was filed, which eventually came to be dismissed on

16.6.2025.

4. The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Ghanashyam Mishra (supra) concludes the issue arising for

consideration on the questions posed before us. It is felicitous to

reproduce the following observations:

“102.1. That once a resolution plan is duly approved by

(2021) 9 S C C 657 ______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.

...

102.3. Consequently all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued.”

5. It is, thus, apparently clear that once the resolution plan is

approved, the claim, unless saved under the resolution plan, comes to

an end and ceases to be enforceable.

6. In order to find out whether the Revenue had submitted any ______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

application in the resolution proceedings before the National Company

Law Tribunal (NCLT), learned counsel for the Revenue was granted

time. All that learned counsel for the Revenue has to say before this

Court is that, though application was submitted before NCLT, the claim

was neither accepted, nor rejected.

7. It was again enquired whether against the order passed by

the NCLT any appeal was preferred before the National Company Law

Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) or any other Court. On this aspect, learned

counsel for the Revenue submits that no further proceedings were

taken.

8. It is, thus, clear that the resolution plan, as approved by the

NCLT, has attained finality. Accordingly, in view of the decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanashyam Mishra (supra), all

the claims towards the tax liability also stand extinguished as against

the assessee arising from the assessment orders passed by the

Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax

(Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal pertaining to the

Assessment Years 2008-2009; 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.

9. Therefore, the questions of law framed by us are decided in ______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

favour of the assessee and against the revenue. It is held that it will

not be open for the revenue to institute any recovery proceedings

against the appellant in view of approval of the resolution plan by the

NCLT.

10. The appeals are, accordingly, allowed. There shall be no

order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

closed.




                         (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ)     (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
                                                   26.11.2025
                     Index            : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes/No
                     bbr

                     To:

                     1. The Assistant Registrar
                        Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
                        Chennai Benches, Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9 Chennai.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Range II, Chennai presently Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai-600 034.

______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm ) T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

bbr

T.C.A.Nos.187, 188 and 189 of 2025

26.11.2025

______________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/11/2025 06:21:58 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter