Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8399 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2025
Crl.A.No.341 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.A.No. 341 of 2022
M/s.Fernando Coal and Coke Merchant,
Represented by its Proprietor Hippolistas Fernando,
25, Kaleeswara Nagar, 1st Street, Kattoor,
Ram Nagar (po),
Coimbatore - 641009. ... Appellant
Vs
1.Santha Alloys India (P) Ltd.,
Rep by its Managing Director,
C.Senthil Kumar,
Chetti Palayam, Palladam Road,
Chikka Naicken Palayam,
Coimbatore District.
2.Mr.C.Senthil Kumar,
Managing Director,
M/s.Senthil Alloys Indian Pvt Ltd.,
Chetti Palayam, Palladam Road,
Chikka Naicken Palayam,
Coimbatore District. ... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, to set aside the Judgment and the order acquittal, acquitting
the accused passed by the Trial Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
Magistrate Level II at Coimbatore in CC.No.326/2017 dated 18.07.2017 and
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:05 pm )
Crl.A.No.341 of 2022
convict the accused by imposing a maximum sentence of 2 years simple
imprisonment and award the compensation directing the respondent accused
to pay double the cheque amount as compensation to the complainant.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.P.Sidharthan
ORDER
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the erstwhile counsel
namely M/s.R.Vasudevan and D.Ravi appeared in the matter, appeared before
this Court and submit that they have already given a change of vakalat
pursuant to which, even though their name was ordered to be deleted, their
name is still appearing in the cause list and request that their name to be
deleted. Be that as it may, even though the cause title shows the name
M/s.R.Vasudevan and D.Ravi, it also categorically shows the name
M/s.S.A.Udayakumari, S.H.S.Manian and G.Balasubramaniam appearing for
the complainant on change of vakalat. The cause title clearly shows their name
on the top for the complainant.
2. Mr.P.Sidharthan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents would submit that on the last occasion also there was no
representation on behalf of the new counsel who had entered appearance.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:05 pm )
Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. In the said circumstances, the above criminal appeal stands
dismissed for non prosecution. Accordingly, connected criminal original
petition also stands closed. No costs.
05.11.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssa
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court Magistrate Level II, Coimbatore.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:05 pm )
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
ssa
05.11.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:05 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!