Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14729 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2023
S.A.(MD).No.63 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
S.A.(MD).No.63 of 2021 and
CMP(MD) No.806 of 2021
1. Sarasu,
2. Chinnammal
3. Adanchi ... Petitioners
Vs
Muthusamy,
S/o.Minjan,Ayyankurichi Village,T.
Pudukkottai Taluk, Ilaiyankudi Taluk,
Sivagangai District.. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code,
against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No. 149 of 2019 on the file of the
Sub Court, Manamadurai dated 29-111-2019 reversing the Judgment and decree
passed in O.S.No. 8 of 2019 on the file of the Learned District Munsif Cum
Judicial Court, Ilayankudi dated 05-01-2019.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD).No.63 of 2021
For Appellants : Mr.S.Paul Murugesh for
Mr.V.Selvakumar
For Respondents : Mr.A.Arun Ramnath for
Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai
JUDGMENT
This second appeal is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. This
appeal is of the year 2021.
2. When the appeal was listed for hearing on 02.11.2023, it was ordered
that despite the pendency of the appeal from the year 2021, the learned counsel
for the appellants is not ready. On the representation of the learned counsel for
the respondent, the appellants were directed to serve copy of the typed set of
papers to the counsel for the respondent and was adjourned to 09.11.2023. On
09.11.2023, there was no representation for the appellants and it was represented
by the learned counsel for the respondent that typed set of papers were not served
on the respondent. Therefore, this appeal was ordered to be listed under the
caption, 'for dismissal'. Thus, the matter is listed under the caption, 'for dismissal'
today.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Even today, Mr.S.Paul Murugesh, learned counsel representing the
learned counsel for the appellants on record, submitted that the appellants are not
ready. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that despite orders from
this Court, typed set of papers were not served on the respondent. The conduct of
the appellants shows that the appellants did not care the orders passed by this
Court. The fact that the appellants have not served the typed set of papers to the
respondent and that the appellants are not ready show that the appellants are not
interested in prosecuting this appeal. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed
for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is
closed.
23.11.2023
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
RR
To
1.The Sub Court, Manamadurai
2.The District Munsif Cum Judicial Court, Ilaiyankudi
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.
RR
23.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!