Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6958 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
M.Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Kallakurichi,
Kallakurichi District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Keelkuppam Police Station,
Kallakurichi District.
3.Subramanian ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
directing the 2nd respondent namely the Inspector of Police, Keelkuppam Police
Station, Kallakurichi District to give police protection to the petitioner to put up
a fence around his land, which is mentioned in the complaint on the basis of the
petitioner's complaint to the 2nd respondent dated 15.02.2023.
For Petitioner : Ms.T.Nithya
For R-1 & 2 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For R3 : Mr.A.Ramesh
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 4
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for directing the 2nd
respondent namely the Inspector of Police, Keelkuppam Police Station,
Kallakurichi District to give police protection to the petitioner to put up a fence
around his land, which is mentioned in the complaint on the basis of the
petitioner's complaint to the 2nd respondent dated 15.02.2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is the
absolute owner of the property concerned in O.S.No.413 of 2012. Since
petitioner's brother namely 3rd respondent is obstructing the possession and
enjoyment of the property, petitioner filed a Suit for declaration and possession.
The Suit was decreed in favour of plaintiff on 30.10.2013. Petitioner also filed
execution petition. Petitioner is in the possession of the property, eventhough
execution petition is filed. Therefore, representation was given seeking police
protection. However, respondent has not provided police protection,
necessitating filing of this petition.
3. In reply, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submitted that, against
the judgment and decree in O.S.No.413 of 2012, 3rd respondent filed Appeal in
A.S.No.73 of 2022 and it is pending on the file of Sub-Court, Kalakurichi. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
4. Considered the submissions and perused the records.
5. It is seen from the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties
that, there are litigations both civil and criminal, pending between the petitioner
and 3rd respondent. Though petitioner succeeded in O.S.No.413 of 2012 filed
for declaration and possession, now there is an Appeal pending against the
judgment and decree. The Suit itself filed for declaration and possession,
meaning that, petitioner is not in possession of the property. Therefore,
petitioner's claim for police protection, when Appeal in A.S.No.73 of 2022 is
pending, cannot be entertained.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
23.06.2023
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order gd
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J.,
gd
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Keelkuppam Police Station, Kallakurichi District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.6342 of 2023
23.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!