Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17109 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2022
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4414 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.11.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
CRL.O.P (MD) No.4414 of 2022
and
Crl.M.P(MD) No.3147 of 2022
Tippu sulthan ...Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Inspector of Police
Tenkasi Police Station,
Tenkasi District
2. K.Adivel
S/o. Not known
The Inspector of Police
Tenkasi Police Station,
Tenkasi District ..Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
praying to call for the records pertaining to charge sheet in STC No.320 of
2020 in Crime No.634 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Tenkasi as illegal and quash the same.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4414 of 2022
For Petitioner : Mr. A.Syed Abdul Kather
For R-1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi
Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge
sheet in STC No.320 of 2020 in Crime No.634 of 2019 pending on the file
of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi
2. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that
the complainant is the Investigation Officer himself. Therefore the charge
sheet cannot be proceeded further. He would further submit that there is no
rough sketch prepared by the Investigating Officer and without rough
sketch how the place of occurrence can be appreciated by the Court during
trial. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner invited the attention of this
Court to the reported ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Mohanlal .Vs. The State of Punjab reported in (2018)7SCC 627.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4414 of 2022
3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) objected to the
submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner stating that on the date
of occurrence i.e., on15.11.2019 the Petitioner along with 217 people had
assembled in the public place threatening public peace, thereby affecting
the movement of people and vehicle on the ground of judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ayothiya temple case. Therefore the case has
been registered.
4. On perusal of the reported ruling and on perusal of copy of charge
sheet enclosed along with this petition, the objection of the learned
Government Advocate(Crl.Side) is rejected and the contention of the
learned Counsel for the Petitioner is found acceptable in the light of the
facts highlighted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The
Complainant herein in the case and the Investigating Officer are one and
the same. The reported ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
State of Haryana vs.Ch.Bhajan Lal (AIR) 1992 SC 604) furnished by the
learned Counsel for the Petitioner is sufficient to quash the charge sheet.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4414 of 2022
5. In the light of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed
and the proceedings in STC No.320 of 2020 pending on the file of the
learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi is here by quashed. Consequently
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.11.2022
Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no aav
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi
2. The Inspector of Police Tenkasi Police Station, Tenkasi District
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4414 of 2022
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
aav
CRL.O.P (MD) No.4414 of 2022
01.11.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!