Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vellasamy Nadar vs The Secretary To Government
2022 Latest Caselaw 11134 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11134 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022

Madras High Court
Vellasamy Nadar vs The Secretary To Government on 27 June, 2022
                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                           DATED : 27.06.2022

                                                  CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                             W.P(MD)No.13478 of 2020 & 9817 of 2022
                                                 and
                  W.M.P(MD)Nos.11238 of 2020, 9889 of 2021, 7033, 7034 and 8479 of 2022

                W.P.(MD)No.13478 of 2020:-

                Vellasamy Nadar, Correspondent,

Dr.Vellasamy Nadar Teacher Training Institute, Dr.T.Vellasamy Nadar, Nagar, Thittai Road, Manakkarambai, Ramapuram Post, Thanjavur – 613 003. ... Petitioner

v.

1.The Director, National Council for Teacher Education, Wing II, Hans Bhawan 1, Bhadur Shaw Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.

2.The Regional Director, The Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Bangalore – 560 013.

3.The Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, College Road, Subba Road Avenue, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Aduthurai – 612 101, Thanjavur District.

5.The Secretary to Government School Education (ERT) Department, The Secretariat, State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai – 9. ... Respondents

(R5 is impleaded vide order dated 16.04.2021 in W.M.P.(MD)No.3130 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.13478 of 2020 by NAVJ)

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned G.O.(Ms) No.87, School Education (ERT) Department, dated 28.05.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent and the consequential impugned order in Na.Ka.No.1731/E1/2019 dated 21.10.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same G.O.No.87/2019 to the extent including the self financed institution like out institute viz., Dr.Vellasamy Nadar Teacher Training Institute in it and also the said consequential impugned order dated 21.10.2019 passed by the 3rd respondent and direct the 3rd respondent to approve the admission of students to the 1st year Diploma in Teacher Education (D.T.Ed) Course in the said institute.

(Prayer is amended vide order dated 16.04.2021 in W.M.P.(MD)No.3225 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.13478 of 2020 by NAVJ)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Dhanaseelan

For Respondents : Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2, Mr.V.Om.Prakash, Government Advocate for R3 to R5.

W.P.(MD)No.9817 of 2022:-

                1.P.Anitha

                2.K.Shylaja                                               ... Petitioners

                                                         Vs.

                1.The Secretary to Government
                  School Education (ERT) Department,

The Secretariat, State of Tamil Nadu, Chennai – 9.

2.The Director, National Council for Teacher Education, Wing II, Hans Bhawan 1, Bhadur Shaw Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.

3.The Regional Director, The Southern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, 1st Floor, CSD Building, HMT Post, Bangalore – 560 013.

4.The Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, College Road, Subba Road Avenue, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

5.The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Aduthurai – 612 101, Thanjavur District.

6.The Correspondent, Dr.Vellasamy Nadar Teacher Training Institute, Dr.T.Vellasamy Nadar, Nagar, Thittai Road, Manakkarambai, Ramapuram Post, Thanjavur – 613 003. ... Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 4th and 5th respondents to grant approval for the admission of the petitioners at the 6th respondent institute for the academic year 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 respectively.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sivakumar

For Respondents : Mr.V.Om.Prakash, Government Advocate for R1, R4 & R5.

Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Standing Counsel for R2 & R3.

Mr.C.Dhanaseelan for R6

COMMON ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioners, the learned standing

counsel and the learned Government Advocate for the official respondents.

2.Both the writ petitions are interlinked. The petitioners in

W.P.(MD)No.9817 of 2022 are students of Dr.Vellasamy Nadar Teacher

Training Institute, Thanjavur. The first petitioner joined the course in the year

2020-2021 ; the second petitioner joined the course in the year 2021-2022. It

is a two years course. The petitioners could not write the examinations because

the respondents 4 and 5 declined to approve the admission of the petitioners.

The reason for non-grant of approval is traced to G.O.(Ms) No.87 School https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Education (ERT) Department dated 28.05.2019. While the students seek relief

for themselves, the management has filed W.P.(MD)No.13478 of 2020

questioning the applicability of said G.O to self-financing institutions.

3.The learned Government Advocate submitted that since the admission

strength of students in the Institute in question fell below the prescribed

minimum number, the relief sought for cannot be granted. In the counter

affidavit filed by the official respondents, it has been submitted that out of 211

self-financing teacher training Institutes, only 48 self-financing teacher training

Institutes have student enrollment above 30%. Considering the decrease in the

admission of students in the Diploma in Elementary Education course, the

Government issued G.O(Ms)No.87 School Education (ERT) Department, dated

28.05.2019 to the effect that if the admission of students for the academic year

2019-20 in the institutions conducting Diploma in Elementary Education course

is less than 30% of the sanctioned strength granted by the National Council of

Teacher Education, such institutions shall not be permitted to admit students

from the academic year 2020-21 onwards. However, the second year students

in those institutions shall be permitted to complete the course in the same

institutions and thereafter steps shall be taken to close such Institutions. The

learned Government Advocate justified the said G.O on the ground that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Government is releasing a substantial sum of money towards aid and if there is

no sufficient number of students, the object and purpose of granting aid stood

defeated.

4.The issue raised in these writ petitions is no longer res integra. In Self

Financing Private Teacher Training Institutes Association rep.by its

President T.V.K.Babu v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011) 5 MLJ 605, a question

arose whether the State being the affiliating body can refuse affiliation with

reference to any of the factors which have been considered by the NCTE while

granting recognition to the Private Self-financing Teacher Training Institutes.

Following the decision reported in (2011) 4 SCC 527 (Chairman Bharrtiya

Educational Society v. State of H.P), the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Madras

High Court held that since the Central Act is operating in the field, the State

cannot issue any guidelines to the contrary. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the

decision reported in (2013) 2 SCC 617 (Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila

Mahavidyalaya v. State of U.P), held as follows :

“79......In the normal circumstances, the role of the State is a very formal one and the State is not expected to obstruct the commencement of admission process and academic courses once recognition is granted and affiliation is found to be acceptable.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

This judgment was followed in State of Rajasthan v. LBS B.Ed. College

(2016) 16 SCC 110.

5.Section 17 of the National Council of Teacher Education Act, 1993

empowers the Regional Committee to take action against the erring institute if

the provisions of the Act are contravened. It can withdraw recognition and

once recognition is withdrawn, the Institution concerned shall discontinue the

course or training in teacher education. Thereafter, affiliation also will be

cancelled by the concerned university or the examining body. Thus, the power

to take action is expressly conferred only on the Regional Committee. While so

by the impugned G.O, the State government arrogates to itself the power to

close down the Teacher Training Institutions both aided as well as self-

financing if the admission norms are not met. In the case on hand, I am not

concerned with aided Institutions. Only one self-financing institution is before

me.

6.The eleven judges bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pai

Foundation and ors v. State of Karnataka and ors (2002) 8 SCC 481 held that

all citizens have a right to establish and administer educational institutions

under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The petitioner in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP(MD)No.13478 of 2020 is not receiving any aid or financial assistance from

the State. He had established the Teacher Training Institute after complying

with all the statutory formalities. The Institution can be ordered to be closed

down only if action is taken under Section 17 of the NCTE Act, 1993. De hors

the said provision, there is no other means of directing closure. The impugned

G.O is not only in conflict with the statutory scheme laid down in the NCTE

Act but is also violative of the fundamental right of the petitioner. When the

activities of the writ petitioner have no financial implications for the State,

directing its closure by citing the admission strength is clearly unreasonable. I

hold that the impugned G.O is not applicable to self-financing Teacher Training

Institutes like the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.13478 of 2020. It is stated that

the students concerned were allowed to write the first year examinations

pursuant to the interim direction given by this Court but their results have not

been declared. Since the writ petitions have been allowed, the authority are

directed to publish the results forthwith and without any delay.

7.These writ petitions are allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

                                                                           27.06.2022

                Index        : Yes / No, Internet       : Yes/ No
                ias/skm
                Issue order copy on 04.07.2022


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                To

1.The Director, State Council of Educational Research and Training, College Road, Subba Road Avenue, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

2.The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Aduthurai – 612 101, Thanjavur District.

3.The Secretary to Government, School Education (ERT) Department, The Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias/skm

W.P(MD)No.13478 of 2020 and W.P.(MD)No.9817 of 2022

27.06.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter